View Full Version : horncall of buckland
alman
09-02-2010, 08:57 AM
long time lurker, first time poster. As I was re reading my red book of westmarch, I came across something I found interesting, and could find no answer here on the Downs.
When the horn call of Buckland is sounded, it is "fear, fire, foes, awake, awake"
Is this literal? is it a magic horn that speaks? a prerecorded message, if you will? Or is it to be interpreted as a horn sound that all hobbits know, and are trained to recognize as MEANING fear fire foes? (remember, the horn had not sounded in living memory, durring the invasion in the fell winter)
Inziladun
09-02-2010, 09:06 AM
Welcome, alman!
Your latter explanation is the answer. "Fear, Fire, Foes" was simply the meaning the call had for the Hobbits.
And even though the "official" call had not been heard since the Fell Winter, I would guess there was still some means of practicing, and letting people know what to listen for.
skip spence
09-02-2010, 09:30 AM
But in that case, isn't it probable that most Hobbits, hearing the call, would just go: "oh dear, not another fire drill... And today when I'm so busy. I'm so not going to interrupt my work for this!"
Inziladun
09-02-2010, 09:35 AM
But in that case, isn't it probable that most Hobbits, hearing the call, would just go: "oh dear, not another fire drill... And today when I'm so busy. I'm so not going to interrupt my work for this!"
Well, maybe it coming in the early hours of the morning was a tipoff. And Hobbits living so near the Old Forest might be disposed to take it more seriously than someone from Hobbiton or Bywater.
alman
09-02-2010, 12:29 PM
then why not in this instance just send out the sound for "FOES! FOES! FOES! Awake!!Awake!" ??
I am more inclined to believe it was actually a magical talking alarm (like the trolls wallet!)
Rumil
09-02-2010, 12:54 PM
Hi Alman,
Welcome to the Downs!
My interpretation is that the horn call tune rhymes with the words 'fear! fire! foes! awake! awake!'
So something like 'Bwa, Ba, Baa, Bawa, Bawa' - guess you can tell I'm no musician huh!
I agree that its not 100% clear either way though.
Morthoron
09-02-2010, 01:54 PM
then why not in this instance just send out the sound for "FOES! FOES! FOES! Awake!!Awake!" ??
I am more inclined to believe it was actually a magical talking alarm (like the trolls wallet!)
It was a generic horn call, A 911 bugle blast to account for all sorts of emergencies.
And the Hobbits had no magic. Absolutely none.
My interpretation is that the horn call tune rhymes with the words 'fear! fire! foes! awake! awake!'
So something like 'Bwa, Ba, Baa, Bawa, Bawa' - guess you can tell I'm no musician huh!
I agree, Rumil. The horn blast imitates the call.
Nerwen
09-02-2010, 09:58 PM
then why not in this instance just send out the sound for "FOES! FOES! FOES! Awake!!Awake!" ?? I am more inclined to believe it was actually a magical talking alarm (like the trolls wallet!)
But Alman, the logic there's completely reversible– why have a magical alarm that only conveys a non-specific "hey, there's some kind of emergency or other" message, when a simple horn call could do the job?
TheGreatElvenWarrior
09-02-2010, 10:25 PM
For some reason I always thought that the Fear, Fire, Foes, Awake thing was just accompanying the actual horn call. Is that not so? :confused:
Nerwen
09-02-2010, 10:36 PM
For some reason I always thought that the Fear, Fire, Foes, Awake thing was just accompanying the actual horn call. Is that not so? :confused:
I think it's the meaning of the call, and also perhaps the call has the same rhythm as the phrase, as Rumil suggests.
Estelyn Telcontar
09-03-2010, 05:51 AM
Even simple hunting horns without valves (which give modern concert horns the ability to play precise notes) can be played with various notes. Compare that to the bugle in military use - every soldier knows whether it is sounding attack, retreat, reveille, or taps. In LotR we also have examples of brass instruments playing signals that signify persons - Beregond identified the "sound of a trumpet ending on a long high note" (RotK) as Faramir's call. No magic involved there either.
Tolkien had military experience, something that a majority of his readers has not had. The most logical explanation for the warning in the Shire and all others uses of horns, trumpets, etc. is that the melody they played had a specific meaning, and each warning had a different sequence of notes.
I remember weekly signal "rehearsals" of the emergency warning signals in my home town when I was young - three long meant something different than one continuous, for example. Even with only one note, the rhythm denoted various meanings.
It could be that each of the words (fear, fire, foes, awake) had its own signal, and when combined, the highest level of warning was sounded.
Selmo
09-03-2010, 06:07 AM
In my time as a youngster and as a leader in a youth organisation, I've learned, played and taught a few dozen military-style bugle calls used during camps.
Just like the Buckland alarm call, most of them have words associated with them. The words help the bugler remember the tune and help the hearers remember what the tune means.
alman
09-03-2010, 06:10 AM
It was a generic horn call, A 911 bugle blast to account for all sorts of emergencies.
And the Hobbits had no magic. Absolutely none
The did have magic, but it came from the outside. Old Took had magical cufflinks, gifted by Gandalf. (perhaps the talking horn of buckland was a gift from Gandalf as well! maybe even in Gandalfs voice.)
Bilbo had sting, and Bilbo also gave many presents on his 111st birthday that were obviously magical.
Also, the horn, if magic, could only have been enchanted to alert a static message in emergencies. It need not have been intelligent and recognize specific danger, just to go off when sounded.
It just seems odd, that with all the horn blowing in the books, only one has words associated with it. (why didnt Theoden toot out "forward!!" instead of a generic blast?)
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 06:31 AM
The did have magic, but it came from the outside. Old Took had magical cufflinks, gifted by Gandalf. (perhaps the talking horn of buckland was a gift from Gandalf as well! maybe even in Gandalfs voice.) Bilbo had sting, and Bilbo also gave many presents on his 111st birthday that were obviously magical.
Surely– given the extreme rarity of magical items in the Shire– the existence, and origins of, a talking horn would be worth mentioning? (We know where Sting, the cufflinks and the presents came from.) And the phrase, from memory, is "the horn–call of Buckland," not "the horn of Buckland"– emphasis on the sound, not the instrument. And more than one horn sounds the call, so it would have to be multiple talking horns.
Also, the horn, if magic, could only have been enchanted to alert a static message in emergencies. It need not have been intelligent and recognize specific danger, just to go off when sounded.
See my first post– why create something magical that only does what the mundane version could do just as easily?
It just seems odd, that with all the horn blowing in the books, only one has words associated with it.
As odd as the presence of a brass band's worth of (pointlessly) magical instruments in the Shire, with nothing to show how they got there? I think not.
Besides, isn't it much cooler to imagine horn calls echoing through the night, than some guy's voice yelling?
mark12_30
09-03-2010, 06:38 AM
In my time as a youngster and as a leader in a youth organisation, I've learned, played and taught a few dozen military-style bugle calls used during camps.
Just like the Buckland alarm call, most of them have words associated with them. The words help the bugler remember the tune and help the hearers remember what the tune means.
I believe Selmo is correct.
For instance, we are all familiar with "Taps". Here is one set of lyrics for "Taps":
"Day is done, gone the sun
From the lakes, from the hills, from the trees
All is well, Safely rest, God is nigh"
So while we usually call that tune "Taps", we might also call it "Day is done". It means, either, Sunset... or a Burial. We all know it.
mark12_30
09-03-2010, 06:41 AM
Wikipedia has an interesting article on Reveille. It includes lyrics, which I now recall, that start with "I can't get 'em up." (U.S. Version.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reveille
Bugle calls in general, in which IMO Taps is sadly neglected:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugle_call
(But I now do remember "Soupy.")
alman
09-03-2010, 07:09 AM
See my first post– why create something magical that only does what the mundane version could do just as easily?
Nerwen- like cufflinks?
Or why not have them "know" when you want them removed, instead of asking them?
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 07:14 AM
See my first post– why create something magical that only does what the mundane version could do just as easily?
Nerwen- like cufflinks?
Or why not have them "know" when you want them removed, instead of asking them?
Okay, but that's more of "gimmick" magical item– a toy, really. And you haven't answered any of my other points.
Inziladun
09-03-2010, 07:18 AM
See my first post– why create something magical that only does what the mundane version could do just as easily?
Nerwen- like cufflinks?
Or why not have them "know" when you want them removed, instead of asking them?
The cufflinks you're referring to were not a product of Hobbit design, but were said to have been given to the Old Took by Gandalf. Hobbits didn't make magical items themselves.
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 07:22 AM
The cufflinks you're referring to were not a product of Hobbit design, but were said to have been given to the Old Took by Gandalf. Hobbits didn't make magical items themselves.
Alman's already stated a theory that the "talking horn of buckland" came from Gandalf.
So that's alright... except that there's no evidence whatever that this horn existed at all.
And Alman, I hate to pick on newbies, but you really are jumping the gun on this one. Before you begin the speculation on how the Talking Horn worked, where it came from and what it sounded like, how about proving that there was a Talking Horn?
Inziladun
09-03-2010, 07:32 AM
Ah. Sorry, I missed that.
In the interest of a pedantic argument, I would wonder why, if there was anything special about the horn used to sound the call, why the wording in the book says that the "horn-call of Buckland" is heard, and not something like the "Horn of Buckland", to note it wasn't an ordinary horn?
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 07:43 AM
Ah. Sorry, I missed that.
In the interest of a pedantic argument, I would wonder why, if there was anything special about the horn used to sound the call, why the wording in the book says that the "horn-call of Buckland" is heard, and not something like the "Horn of Buckland", to note it wasn't an ordinary horn?
Beat you to that one, my friend– see my post at #14.
Inziladun
09-03-2010, 07:57 AM
Seems like that's pretty much it, then. :rolleyes:
*throws up hands and walks off, whistling*
alman
09-03-2010, 08:09 AM
And Alman, I hate to pick on newbies, but you really are jumping the gun on this one. Before you begin the speculation on how the Talking Horn worked, where it came from and what it sounded like, how about proving that there was a Talking Horn?
the book does that for me. The call is Fear fire foes, awake awake.
not bwa bwa bwa. and, as I stated, no other horn is associated with a word. Why no horn of hornburg blown by helm the hammerhand with some word of revenge or fear? why no call of theoden"forward" instead of bursting asunder? why no horn of Merry from scatha the worm that lifts the hearts of all who hear it have some meaning/words?
also, the phoneCALL i recieved was someone speaking to me on the other end, not just the ring of the phone. Someone may call out to you as well. A call can be a voice or just noise.
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 08:18 AM
And Alman, I hate to pick on newbies, but you really are jumping the gun on this one. Before you begin the speculation on how the Talking Horn worked, where it came from and what it sounded like, how about proving that there was a Talking Horn?
the book does that for me. The call is Fear fire foes, awake awake.
not bwa bwa bwa. and, as I stated, no other horn is associated with a word. Why no horn of hornburg blown by helm the hammerhand with some word of revenge or fear? why no call of theoden"forward" instead of bursting asunder? why no horn of Merry from scatha the worm that lifts the hearts of all who hear it have some meaning/words?
also, the phoneCALL i recieved was someone speaking to me on the other end, not just the ring of the phone. Someone may call out to you as well. A call can be a voice or just noise.
You still haven't answered my points. Look at them again.
alman
09-03-2010, 08:18 AM
or, you may prove that it did not talk.
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 08:19 AM
or, you may prove that it did not talk.
I don't have to– you're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof is on you. Them's the breaks, kid.;)
Inziladun
09-03-2010, 08:32 AM
The call is Fear fire foes, awake awake.
not bwa bwa bwa. and, as I stated, no other horn is associated with a word. Why no horn of hornburg blown by helm the hammerhand with some word of revenge or fear? why no call of theoden"forward" instead of bursting asunder? why no horn of Merry from scatha the worm that lifts the hearts of all who hear it have some meaning/words?
Actually, it appears that there might be another instance of a horn-call being associated with words, according to how one interprets it.
After Théoden bursts the horn prior to the charge of the Rohirrim, we have this:
And straightaway all the horns in the host were lifted up in music, and the blowing of the horns of Rohan in that hour was like a storm upon the plain and thunder in the mountains.
Ride now, Ride now! Ride to Gondor!
ROTK The Ride of the Rohirrim
The indication looks to me that the "Ride now!" call there was contained in the music of the horns, not in a spoken command.
Ibrîniðilpathânezel
09-03-2010, 08:33 AM
There was no "magic talking horn" involved. In the Scouring of the Shire, when Merry rides off, he says that he's going to blow the horn of Rohan to give the ruffians some "different music," and shortly thereafter, Sam "heard Merry change the note, and up went the Horn-cry of Buckland, shaking the air." If a specific magic horn was required, Merry would not have been able to play it on another horn. It was nothing more than a specific sequence of notes, devised by the folk of Buckland to be a warning of danger, summoning aid. Heaven knows there are plenty of examples in history of specific horn or bugle calls being used for specific purposes — like attack, retreat, go to sleep, etc., or to identify certain inidivuals, as Tolkien mentions Faramir's horn call in The Siege of Minas Tirith.
I actually did write my take on the horn call of Buckland as the introduction to my theme for Merry in my FotR symphony, but it's in one of the movements that currently exists only as a rather mediocre sounding recording of a MIDI instrument rendition. Maybe I should post it on my site, anyway, 'cause it doesn't look as if I'll finish rescoring it in the near future....
alman
09-03-2010, 08:43 AM
Inziladun- exellent point! finally, some point of interest that helps clear things up. I dont have my copy on me, so at the moment , I will take your word. I would like to check for quotes, and see if someone is credied with speaking something else after the "ride to gondor" line.
also
Sam "heard Merry change the note, and up went the Horn-cry of Buckland, shaking the air."
Merrys horn does something else besides "shake" the air momments before, like maybe "ring" like this was from two diffent horns.
I took this to mean that he activated the Horncall of buckland by a specific note from his horn.
alman
09-03-2010, 08:45 AM
I don't have to– you're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof is on you. Them's the breaks, kid
The book says fear fire foes, so the horn went up fear fire foes. how can you argue that?
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 08:59 AM
Inziladun- exellent point! finally, some point of interest that helps clear things up. I dont have my copy on me, so at the moment , I will take your word. I would like to check for quotes, and see if someone is credied with speaking something else after the "ride to gondor" line.
also
Sam "heard Merry change the note, and up went the Horn-cry of Buckland, shaking the air."
Merrys horn does something else besides "shake" the air momments before, like maybe "ring" like this was from two diffent horns.
I took this to mean that he activated the Horncall of buckland by a specific note from his horn.
Alman, not to knock Zil, but this was logically cleared up way before he found that quote. You have clearly become attached to your talking horn theory, to the extent of thinking up creative little details about how this horn supposedly operated –but it's all a house of cards, because you have no evidence that any such horn existed. You've misunderstood the text, that's all. It happens to everyone.
Now, it has happened here before that a member– usually a new member– has brought up an eccentric pet theory, and stubbornly refused to back down no matter what arguments were marshalled against it. This has been known to cause some pretty bad blood and general unpleasantness, so I hope you'll be more sensible.:)
EDIT:X'd with Alman.
Eomer of the Rohirrim
09-03-2010, 08:59 AM
I do not take other talking objects - the troll's purse, Turin's sword - at face value, thinking of them as storytellers' decoration, and it is, in any case, implied to a far smaller degree that the horn talked.
Still, interesting topic.
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 09:05 AM
I don't have to– you're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof is on you. Them's the breaks, kid
The book says fear fire foes, so the horn went up fear fire foes. how can you argue that?
What do you mean, how can I argue it? Read the thread! People have explained over and over again that horn-calls often conventionally have words attached to them. A bit earlier you seemed to have accepted that.
You've got nothing, Alman. There's no Talking Horn of Buckland in this story. You just made a mistake, okay?
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 09:13 AM
I do not take other talking objects - the troll's purse, Turin's sword - at face value, thinking of them as storytellers' decoration, and it is, in any case, implied to a far smaller degree that the horn talked.
Still, interesting topic.
The sword and the purse I'm willing to concede might have actually"talked" (though you can also interpret it as more of a metaphorical/poetic license thing).
This isn't even "decoration". I mean, it isn't implied at all that the horn(s) literally spoke. It's just a horn call that means "Fear, fire, foes, awake, awake!"
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 09:24 AM
As for why "it's just a horn-call" is an inherently preferable explanation to "the Bucklanders for some reason had a whole lot of magical talking horns that (also) for some reason are never, ever mentioned as such, and we don't know where they came from, but maybe they were a present from Gandalf, even though this is never mentioned either,"...may I recommend a certain shaving implement belonging to a certain English friar (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor)?
Anyway, Alman, look: all these other topics-gone-bad I'm thinking of started just this way: the original poster asks a seemingly genuine question, of the "Is X true or is Y true" type, and then it turns out he or she had already made up his or her mind that it was Y, and wasn't prepared to accept anything else. So really, I wish people wouldn't ask questions they don't want answered. It gets tiring.
Morthoron
09-03-2010, 10:06 AM
The did have magic, but it came from the outside. Old Took had magical cufflinks, gifted by Gandalf. (perhaps the talking horn of buckland was a gift from Gandalf as well! maybe even in Gandalfs voice.)
Bilbo had sting, and Bilbo also gave many presents on his 111st birthday that were obviously magical.
Ultra-rare gifts are not like some generic, magic horn that sits outside in all types of weather. The Hobbits, and I am referring to the vast majority of the whole Shire, would have never been acquainted with any sort of magic in their entire lives. Tolkien said the Hobbits possessed no innate magic, and goes to great lengths to show the mundanity of their lives, where eccentric folks like the Old Took and Bilbo Baggins are such an exception to the rule that they are considered bizarre by the common halflings.
Also, the horn, if magic, could only have been enchanted to alert a static message in emergencies. It need not have been intelligent and recognize specific danger, just to go off when sounded.
A static, pre-programmed magic horn? This isn't some rap song with sequenced music.
It just seems odd, that with all the horn blowing in the books, only one has words associated with it. (why didnt Theoden toot out "forward!!" instead of a generic blast?)
Tolkien is using metaphor. He uses metaphor often. There were no locomotives in the Shire, but Tolkien refers to a train as a point of comparison. Look up the terms metaphor/simile. It may aid in your understanding of literature.
Puddleglum
09-03-2010, 10:37 AM
why didnt Theoden toot out "forward!!" instead of a generic blast?)
Because he had already delivered a more energizing call to the charge...
Arise, arise, Riders of Theoden!
Fell deeds awake: fire and slaughter!
spear shall be shaken, shield be splintered,
a sword-day, a red day, ere the sun rises!
Ride now, ride now! Ride to Gondor!
Besides, it conveys a lot more energy to blow so hard the horn bursts
than just to "toot" out a "forward" call.
Puddleglum
09-03-2010, 10:56 AM
And straightaway all the horns in the host were lifted up in music, and the blowing of the horns of Rohan in that hour was like a storm upon the plain and thunder in the mountains.
Ride now, Ride now! Ride to Gondor!
The indication looks to me that the "Ride now!" call there was contained in the music of the horns, not in a spoken command.
Possibly, tho it's always seemed to me that these words were also cried out by Theoden (even tho that isn't explicitly stated). Ie, that the sequence was:
Theoden makes his "arise now" call, ending with a first "Ride now, Ride now, Ride to Gondor"
Theoden blows such a blast that his horn bursts.
The Rohirrim respond with a blowing of horns "like a storm upon the plain."
Energy builds until Theoden cries again "Ride now, Ride now! Ride to Gondor!", Yells to & spurs Snowmane, and leads the Glorious Charge; Adrenaline pumping; "Borne up as a god of old, even as Orome the great in the battle of the Valar when the world was young."
Puddleglum
09-03-2010, 11:12 AM
I do not take other talking objects - the troll's purse, Turin's sword - at face value, thinking of them as storytellers' decoration, and it is, in any case, implied to a far smaller degree that the horn talked. Still, interesting topic.
The trolls purse and Turin's black sword seem to be pretty specific clear cases of objects speaking with words - just from how those incidents are described.
"Troll's purses are mischief, and this one was no exception. 'Ere, oo are you?' it squeaked as it left (Bills) pocket." In this case, a simple set of notes or grunts would have no particular meaning to Bilbo. And the story is written from his perspective. Seems clear Tolkien intended for Bill to have a talking purse.
Turin actually carried on a (short) conversation with his sword. Turin: "Black sword, will you drink my blood?" Sword: "Gladly, so I can forget the innocent blood YOU made me drink." (paraphrase of quotes).
In the case of the horn call of Buckland, there is never an indication in Tolkien's wording that any of the horns themselves spoke or squeaked words. It's always the horn-CALL (ie, the music) that is associated with the words.
skip spence
09-03-2010, 11:51 AM
I do not take other talking objects - the troll's purse, Turin's sword - at face value, thinking of them as storytellers' decoration, and it is, in any case, implied to a far smaller degree that the horn talked.
Still, interesting topic.
I quite like that idea, especially since I'm not too fond of the talking objects from a... ahem, canonical point of view, though the purse is fun if you see Bilbo as a stand-alone fairytale.
But yeah, I can totally see how Bilbo, when writing his story, would add certain elements to make it more captivating and remove other elements to make himself look better. Perhaps he just stepped on a twig and was caught by the trolls without much drama but that wouldn't make a good story, would it?
And there were no witnesses around to contradict him. If you accept the premiss that Tolkien was merely the translator of these stories from an ancient past you also have to take into account that, as far as I can remember, no-one was around to hear Turin's sword talking to him, so there's no telling exactly what happened before he took his own life.
And yeah, I'm also quite certain Tolkien didn't intent the Buckland Horn to carry a magically pre-recorded voice message. I don't mind if you read it that way though, alman.
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 12:02 PM
And yeah, I'm also quite certain Tolkien didn't intent the Buckland Horn to carry a magically pre-recorded voice message. I don't mind if you read it that way though, alman.
Indeed, there's nothing to stop anyone imagining it anyway they like. That's fine. However, Alman did start this thread just to ask about it.
Nerwen
09-03-2010, 12:13 PM
Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim
I do not take other talking objects - the troll's purse, Turin's sword - at face value, thinking of them as storytellers' decoration, and it is, in any case, implied to a far smaller degree that the horn talked.
Still, interesting topic.I quite like that idea, especially since I'm not too fond of the talking objects from a... ahem, canonical point of view, though the purse is fun if you see Bilbo as a stand-alone fairytale.
On the whole I tend to agree with Puddleglum that the purse and the sword are probably meant to be actually speaking. But still, the "translator conceit" does give the reader a fair bit of leeway there.
Eomer of the Rohirrim
09-03-2010, 01:20 PM
It's interesting. I think many readers struggle to fit the cute, talking purse from the children's story The Hobbit into Tolkien's world. I've always considered it as Bilbo having a laugh with younger hobbits, and embellishing his tale (while scurrying over his incompetence, in that case, as a burglar).
Turin's sword? Nah. I don't believe in it. I just read that as an element added to the myth by subsequent generations. I can genuinely believe in the ancient character of Turin (well, not believe in him, but you know what I mean) but suspension of disbelief only goes so far.
Inziladun
09-03-2010, 01:47 PM
Possibly, tho it's always seemed to me that these words were also cried out by Theoden (even tho that isn't explicitly stated). Ie, that the sequence was:
Theoden makes his "arise now" call, ending with a first "Ride now, Ride now, Ride to Gondor"
Theoden blows such a blast that his horn bursts.
The Rohirrim respond with a blowing of horns "like a storm upon the plain."
Energy builds until Theoden cries again "Ride now, Ride now! Ride to Gondor!", Yells to & spurs Snowmane, and leads the Glorious Charge; Adrenaline pumping; "Borne up as a god of old, even as Orome the great in the battle of the Valar when the world was young."
Again, it could be an interpretation issue, but my feeling is that if the "Ride Now!" came after the horns answered Théoden's first shout, and were spoken by him, the wording would indicate that.
As it is, we have a passage describing horns blowing in response to Théoden in what seems to be a "call to arms", then a statement that Théoden "cried to Smowmane and the horse sprang away".
Could it be as you say? Sure. But I think there's room for discussion, either way.
Morthoron
09-03-2010, 01:47 PM
Turin's sword? Nah. I don't believe in it. I just read that as an element added to the myth by subsequent generations. I can genuinely believe in the ancient character of Turin (well, not believe in him, but you know what I mean) but suspension of disbelief only goes so far.
Actually, Eomer, Tolkien borrowed that scene directly from the Finnish Kalevala. It is as it was intended, without embellishment. It's Tolkien's version of fan-fic.
Eomer of the Rohirrim
09-03-2010, 02:18 PM
Actually, Eomer, Tolkien borrowed that scene directly from the Finnish Kalevala. It is as it was intended, without embellishment. It's Tolkien's version of fan-fic.
You know, Morth, I thought I had read it somewhere, but my memory is bad and my Tolkien knowledge goes only so deep. Fascinating!
If we talk Kalevala, I can 'believe' in many of the characters and the struggles they encountered; however I wouldn't believe the talking sword scene actually happened. Same with Tolkien's myths. It might be a bit odd to divide a fiction into parts you believe and parts you don't, but there you go. ;)
mark12_30
09-03-2010, 07:21 PM
Actually, Eomer, Tolkien borrowed that scene directly from the Finnish Kalevala. It is as it was intended, without embellishment. It's Tolkien's version of fan-fic.
Morth, I'm glad that you brought that up. Sil is so heavily mythical, that seems to me to be the heart of this whole discussion; what works in the myth and what might not. LittleManPoet describes it as "what breaks the enchantment." Apparently for some on this thread, too much magic breaks the enchantment. Odd, but there it is.
Morthoron
09-03-2010, 08:06 PM
Morth, I'm glad that you brought that up. Sil is so heavily mythical, that seems to me to be the heart of this whole discussion; what works in the myth and what might not. LittleManPoet describes it as "what breaks the enchantment." Apparently for some on this thread, too much magic breaks the enchantment. Odd, but there it is.
You are right, in a manner, Mxii_xxx. But it is more like too much magic where it doesn't belong, and who wields it. Prior to the 4th Age in the Shire, none but a small coterie of 5 or 6 Hobbits out of thousands (Bilbo, Frodo, Sam, Merry, Pippin and perhaps Fredegar) knew anything of magic rings, elvish swords that glowed blue, the true nature of wizards or of Sauron, for that matter. Most Hobbits were xenophobic isolationists, and even considered other Hobbits who lived beyond their borders as 'queer'. It was even 'queer' to wear boots! The Gaffer doesn't even go in for ironmongery "whether it wears well or no."
So, along comes a poster -- who I am sure is an affable, logical and decent person -- and mistakes a metaphor for actual magic in the Shire. A speaking horn? What exactly is the point? Why not just scream "Fear, Fire, Foes"? Unless, of course, the magic horn had a clip-on microphone running through a Marshall Stack and was blown at 120 decibels like a Who concert. Maybe magic Hobbit amplifiers go up to 11.
I am being facetious. Only the lead guitarist of Spinal Tap has an amp that goes up to 11.
mark12_30
09-04-2010, 07:07 AM
So, along comes a poster -- who I am sure is an affable, logical and decent person -- and mistakes a metaphor for actual magic in the Shire. A speaking horn? What exactly is the point? Why not just scream "Fear, Fire, Foes"? Unless, of course, the magic horn had a clip-on microphone running through a Marshall Stack and was blown at 120 decibels like a Who concert. Maybe magic Hobbit amplifiers go up to 11.
I am being facetious. Only the lead guitarist of Spinal Tap has an amp that goes up to 11.
I was unclear; I do not (personally) believe that the horn of Buckland was magical or spoke with a voice; I am pro-bugle-tune-lyrics. I was actually pursuing the Troll's talking purse, which never bothered me, but which apparently breaks the enchantment for certain others.
I like loud amplifiers, though. When I am in the mood for them.
skip spence
09-04-2010, 08:42 AM
I was actually pursuing the Troll's talking purse, which never bothered me, but which apparently breaks the enchantment for certain others.
But surely you can see where we are coming from though? I mean, there's no reason why the talking purse would bother a casual reader of the Hobbit and it does add some fun to the story. But many of us here are übernerds who have even ploughed through various volumes of HoME (and that ain't always easy) in order to better understand the metaphysics of this fictional world, and from this perspective the idea of cockney Trolls with talking purses fits poorly into the later, more elaborate world of Arda that Tolkien develoved.
mark12_30
09-04-2010, 12:14 PM
But surely you can see where we are coming from though? I mean, there's no reason why the talking purse would bother a casual reader of the Hobbit and it does add some fun to the story. But many of us here are übernerds who have even ploughed through various volumes of HoME (and that ain't always easy) in order to better understand the metaphysics of this fictional world, and from this perspective the idea of cockney Trolls with talking purses fits poorly into the later, more elaborate world of Arda that Tolkien develoved.
Skip, I can definitely see where you are coming from. I have ploughed through a fair amount of HoME myself. I am very intense about canonicity (reference the thread of that name) and, now that I think about it in this vein, if I were writing a fanfic (or an RPG) and a cockney troll's talking purse entered the scene, my red pen would be out in a flash. Ditto for a talking sword.
However, and on the other hand-- I personally do not choose to criticise the professor for indulging his whimsy in a children's tale nor for introducing something uber-mytological into his mythology. He has that right.
Farmer Giles of Ham does not stand well beside Elrond of Rivendell, but that doesn't mean I would edit either one.
In case you have not yet guessed, my canonicity vote goes heartily towards "the author".
alman
09-05-2010, 09:27 AM
Thank you all for the intellegent replies to my question. After reading the replies, and some other reading on horns as suggested, i agree that the sounds were just sounding like or stood for words. This, i think, was difficult for me due to the fact that these first chapters have a different feel that the rest of the book. They are a bridge from the hobbit to the bigger world, from a childrens story to a more grown up version. the locomotion , talking fox, fireworks, multiple magical presents from Dale, and some Dwarf make ones(dwarves make magic toys?!) and the strangeness/childlikeness of ol Tom B.
These lighter elements helped enable my belief in the horn. that was how my 12y.o. brain saw it, and I never questoned it in my multiple re-reads over the years.
Also, the way most hobbits are described as not getting involved, and adventures making one late for dinner, and not into reading mostly, unless it was bout a family tree, that training alerts on a horn was very out of character. I suppose this is only the norm in Buckland, where invasions from the Old Forrest, or other gates and borders (being on the edge of the Shire) were a bit more of a problem than in Hobbiton. I do recall reading that the borders were more active in the years leading up to the leaving of the ring. I suppose the Bucklanders had retrained in the years of intruders on the borders.
Nerwen
09-11-2010, 05:50 AM
Sorry for jumping on you, alman! I misjudged you. It's just that I've recently had a whole series of real-life arguments in which the other parties simply refused to admit they could be mistaken about some trivial point, no matter the evidence. I guess it's reaching the stage where my approach is "get exasperated first, ask questions later".:rolleyes: I really need to stop that.
Morthoron
09-11-2010, 10:13 AM
Yes...Nerwen, like Ents, becomes downright hasty when provoked. Except her bark and an Ent's bark are two different things. :D
Puddleglum
09-11-2010, 04:13 PM
Except her bark and an Ent's bark...Now that's good! I love it. ROFL
alman
09-14-2010, 07:51 AM
nerwin-
no problem. I was just looking for some insight. ( Who am I to pass judgement?Even the very wise cannot see all ends) I ended up going back to the book and hunting for all horns. What got me was Borrimer (sp) in the FoTR sounded his horn before the fellowship set out, and all that heard the "voice" of the horn stood ready/got up/something or other.
vBulletin® v3.8.9 Beta 4, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.