PDA

View Full Version : Balrog getting killed?


Mandos
01-03-2003, 12:54 PM
In the books, Gandalf fights the Balrog on Zirak-zigil ( i think that's how it's spelled!) and kills him. In TTT movie,Gandalf uses his sword to hold lightining and stabs the balrog, killing him. How can this kill a Balrog, and does it mention this in the book?

obloquy
01-03-2003, 01:47 PM
What do you mean by 'how can this kill a Balrog'? Stabbing is a pretty effective way to kill almost anything.

Mandos
01-03-2003, 01:55 PM
TRUE. but an immortal fire demon spirit of Morgoth would seem to take a bit more.

Mandos
01-03-2003, 02:01 PM
it just seems like a sword wouldnt do much damage to it. the balrog really seems to be more spirit than flesh, so how can this hurt it?

[ January 03, 2003: Message edited by: Mandos ]

Afrodal Fenyar
01-03-2003, 02:03 PM
Ask Peter Jackson. I don't think this belongs to "The Books"-section. The Movies actually have nothing to do with Tolkien, they are only based on his books. Sorry, but I think this is a stupid question.

(The only mention of Gandalf using his sword while battling the Balrog is that he used it to defend from the Balrog's sword)

Mandos
01-03-2003, 02:13 PM
my inquiry sir, was based on the books. i asked if there was any mention of gandalf fightining the balrog on zirak-zigil and i was wandering if a sword could kill a spirit of fire as the balrog is described by tolkien,"of shadow and flame" and the valarukar as described in the Silmarillion.

Manwe Sulimo
01-03-2003, 04:29 PM
Suddenly Gandalf laughed. 'But what would they say in song? Those that looked up from afar thought that the mountain was crowned with storm. Thunder they heard, and lightening, they said, smote upon Celebdil, and leaped back broken into tongues of flame. Is not that enough? A great smoke rose about us, vapour and steam. Ice fell like rain. I threw down my enemy, and he fell from the high place and broke the mountain-side where he smote it in his ruin.'

The lightening, at least, was accurate.

zacattack
01-03-2003, 05:47 PM
Well PJ was wrong because in the books Gandalf said that the Balrog was killed by the fall.

Mandos
01-03-2003, 05:51 PM
true. i wonder how little ol' gandalf threw a balrog off a mountain though.

Olorins_dumber_brother
01-03-2003, 06:02 PM
never though about how he could do it, although i assume that he is a lot tougher then he lets on. although if we are goning to wonder about such things, how come the fall off the mountin killed the balrog, when both he and Gandalf survied the fall from the bridge? the fall from the bridge to the bottem of the pit that was reputated to be a much longer fall then any that could happen from the top of a mountin. kind of stange if you ask me

Mandos
01-03-2003, 06:06 PM
although, there was water at the bottom of the chasm, when the balrog was thrown off the mountain, there was only very sharp rocks.

obloquy
01-03-2003, 06:11 PM
That Balrogs were ever killed at all indicates that they were incarnate, and thus susceptible to attacks with sharp things. For more on Balrog incarnation, see this thread (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=002488).

Edit: Gandalf was not relatively 'little' (that is, relative to the Balrog's attributes), either in spiritual potency or in physical size.

[ January 03, 2003: Message edited by: obloquy ]

Mandos
01-03-2003, 06:16 PM
since they were evil they couldnt be reincarnated as elves could.

burrahobbit
01-03-2003, 06:21 PM
Or like Sauron, either. OH WAIT.

P.S. oloquy wasn't talking about reincarnation, just regular old incarnation.

[ January 03, 2003: Message edited by: burrahobbit ]

Mandos
01-03-2003, 08:35 PM
oh. is there any evidence that servants of evil, morgoth, sauron, can be brought back as Gandalf was? Or do they just sit in the Halls of Mandos, or cast out with Morgoth?

Mandos
01-03-2003, 08:57 PM
Weren't Balrogs originally some of the Mia? or were they different beings altogether?

Mandos
01-03-2003, 09:20 PM
the balrogs are suppose to be intelligent since they were once these "good" beings. Could they speak though?

obloquy
01-04-2003, 06:41 AM
is there any evidence that servants of evil, morgoth, sauron, can be brought back as Gandalf was?

Depends on how 'incarnate' they were. Sauron's incarnation is complicated. The Ring was Sauron's 'anchor to life', so as long as it existed, he would exist. Tolkien tells us that Morgoth, even after having been executed as an Incarnate, could still conceivably regenerate to the point of reincarnating himself.

Weren't Balrogs originally some of the Mia? or were they different beings altogether?

Yes, Balrogs were corrupted Maiar.

the balrogs are suppose to be intelligent since they were once these "good" beings. Could they speak though?

Of course they could speak.

Legolas
01-04-2003, 01:13 PM
Such a being was bound to its incarnation to an extent.

This is why Fingolfin could injure Morgoth, why Gil-galad and Elendil could kill Sauron, why Glorfindel and Ecthelion could kill their respective balrogs, why Saruman could die the way he did, etc.

Mandos
01-04-2003, 06:27 PM
To an extent? To no extent at all. No evil person was ever incarnated, or was there an incident?

Manwe Sulimo
01-04-2003, 07:08 PM
Unless I'm seriously missing something really big, weren't all evil people incarnated? Melkor had a body, Sauron had bodies, the Balrogs had bodies....

Unless you mean reincarnated. Sauron was on no less then two occasions.

burrahobbit
01-04-2003, 07:22 PM
Yeah, Manwe. Pretty much.

Mandos
01-04-2003, 07:32 PM
sorry i erred. i did indeed mean reincarnated. i didnt think about sauron. after the destruction of Numenor i suppose he was reincarnated since he definately had a physical form to fight Gil-galad and Elendil. i wonder if gothmog or any of the valarukar were reincarnated though. Sauron was strong in power and enchantments. I do suppose that the balrogs were enchanted since they were Miar. I wonder why they didnt speak though?

Manwe Sulimo
01-04-2003, 08:03 PM
They did speak. And they were probably just as powerful as Sauron, because they were all Maiar. Sauron just chose to be more independent, or Melkor liked him better.

Mandos
01-04-2003, 11:17 PM
Why did Sauron not look like the Blarogs then? im not arguing, but am genuinely curious, where does it mention a blarog speaking?

burrahobbit
01-04-2003, 11:35 PM
Because he didn't want to. The Balrog does spells, spells require talking.

Mandos
01-05-2003, 12:51 PM
r u referring to the incident with something and gandalf having a battle over the door in moria?

Manwe Sulimo
01-05-2003, 02:00 PM
I'll answer a question with a question:
When was it mentioned that Maiar couldn't talk?

Mandos
01-05-2003, 02:07 PM
What of evil suverted transformed Miaa?

Manwe Sulimo
01-05-2003, 02:12 PM
Sauron talked as a wolf smilies/biggrin.gif

Mandos
01-05-2003, 02:15 PM
true.........but wasnt he more powerful than the valarukar? He was favored of Morgoth.

Yavanna Kementari
01-05-2003, 02:58 PM
The Valaraukar were Maiar. Greater than these Evil spirits was Sauron. But these spirits can take on a form of their liking. Gandalf is a Maia, he has taken the form of a man. But once He was killed he could not take on the same form as Gandalf the Grey, He became Gandalf the White. Sauron was struck down and when came back he took the form of a Great Eye. There was a Balrog killed in one of the History books of middle earth. And if you pay attention to the movie, I believe they show The Balrog falling off the side of mountain and dying. smilies/smile.gif I think I have to see it again--Yavanna

Mandos
01-05-2003, 03:03 PM
I never said that Balrogs couldnt die, i asked where does it give and intstance of one speaking. also, if you read the Silmarillion you will see that many other balrogs have been killed. Including the king of the balrogs who was killed by ecthalion of the fountain in the city of Gondolin.

Yavanna Kementari
01-05-2003, 03:38 PM
I have read the Silmarillion, The Lord of the Rings(both,repeatedly),The Unfinished Tales, and The Books of lost Tales, I don't recall A Balrog speaking but I am sure they can because they are Maiar and thats..
Ecthelion. smilies/smile.gif Sorry to bother you

Manwe Sulimo
01-05-2003, 09:01 PM
How about this...Balrogs were Maiar spirits of fire. Arien (sp?) was also a Maia spirit of fire....and I'm pretty sure she could talk. As could any Maia in any form, I'm sure.

Mandos
01-05-2003, 09:48 PM
That's an interesting point, this makes one wonder if Arien could be considered a "good balrog" sice both were demons of fire. Arien was the one who carried the vessel that is the sun. Who was the one that carried the moon?

burrahobbit
01-05-2003, 11:06 PM
Arien isn't a demon.

[ January 06, 2003: Message edited by: burrahobbit ]

Mandos
01-05-2003, 11:09 PM
Sorry, i meant Spirits of Fire.

Yavanna Kementari
01-06-2003, 12:48 PM
Tilion was the Maia that guided the Isil or the moon that containd the last silver flower of Telperion.
I don't think Arien was a demon just a spirit of fire. But I'm sure she was beautiful not ugly like the Valaraukar. smilies/smile.gif
Yavanna

Gandalf_theGrey
01-06-2003, 01:08 PM
Yavanna Kementari:

Hail friend. smilies/smile.gif * bows *

Your words remind me of a poem I once heard recited by a Hobbit on one of my trips through the Shire:

Yet even Arien rides alone,
Anar’s course steadily keeping,
gazing on a frozen pond
to thaw and heal the weeping.

Each fiery tear she gently takes
as dew gathered into a vial.
The heat she smoothes with caring song
into a soft gold smile.

The wind can frighten with its change.
The sun above endures.
Draw strength now from the dawn’s new light
As it comes to reassure.