View Full Version : Why didn't Frodo use the eagles to fly over Mt. Doom?
QN_VICTORIA
01-19-2004, 10:45 PM
Hey all you Lord of the Ring readers, I was just wondering um, why didn't Frodo use the eagles to fly over Mt. Doom to destroy the ring?....would'nt that have been much easier, and quicker...or maybe he couldn't, but if someone could tell me why, I would be most grateful...and this is probably already a thread so if anyone could set the link that would help as well...thanks smilies/tongue.gif
[edited to name the thread properly. Sharkû]
<font size=1 color=339966>[ 5:37 AM January 20, 2004: Message edited by: Sharkû ]
Estelyn Telcontar
01-20-2004, 01:56 AM
Welcome to the Downs, QN_VICTORIA! You've thought of something quite logical, and the easiest answer is: If Frodo had done that, we wouldn't be here discussing the book today! smilies/biggrin.gif However, there have been good discussions on this question, and I'll be happy to show you the one I consider best:
The Great Eagle Mystery (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=000779). Enjoy!
Maverick
01-22-2004, 06:46 PM
I think if Frodo had tried that the Nazgul would have flown over and killed the eagle with ease. Then all would be lost cause then the Nazgul have the ring.
QN_VICTORIA
01-22-2004, 07:59 PM
Well that's true but there were also plenty of other eagles..Legolas, Gandalf, Aragorn, Gimli could rode the others to keep Frodo safe, I'm sure they could've set up a buddy system or something.... smilies/smile.gif
Eothain Elfwine
01-23-2004, 08:35 PM
The eagles are entities in their own rights, not taxis. Perhaps like Elves they have their own worries and issues. Perhaps like Radagast they rarely come to that area of the world. On the whole they choose to do what they do when they do it. And probably flying a little creature called Frodo to the Dark Land was not one of the things they chose to do. Though they did pick him up afterward . . .
The Saucepan Man
01-23-2004, 11:13 PM
This is the first question that I asked when I joined the Downs. Yes, even some of us mods (or one of us at least) failed to spot the search function when we first joined. smilies/rolleyes.gif
The thread that Esty linked to has a lot of interesting thoughts, and is quite fun too. But I think that the issue is still open to debate. I've never bought this idea that the Eagles were reluctant to get involved in the affairs of the Free Peoples. After all, they helped out when it was really necessary. And it was rather necessary that the Ring be destroyed.
Of course, even if the Eagles had flown Frodo over Mount Doom, he couldn't have thrown the Ring in. He would have succumbed to it the same way that he did at Sammath Naur. And an Eagle bearing the Ring couldn't have dropped it in either, since no Ringbearer could willingly have destroyed it (unless they got Tom Bombadil to so it, but he wasn't interested).
So perhaps they could have dropped Frodo in, Ring and all. smilies/evil.gif
But if that had been the plan of the Wise, would they really have been any better than Sauron?
A better plan would have been to capture an Orc, give the Ring to him and then throw him in. smilies/biggrin.gif
Seriously, I think that the answer is that the Eagles wouldn't have made it to Mount Doom. But would the Nazgul really have been able to stop a fleet of Eagles?
Lhunardawen
01-24-2004, 02:44 AM
But would the Nazgul really have been able to stop a fleet of Eagles?
Not to degrade the Eagles, but somehow I think not. There hasn't been a chance to show what would happen when the Nazgul and the Eagles fight in midair because just as the Eagles arrived, the Nazgul were summoned by Sauron because of Frodo and the Ring. But if they had stayed in the battlefront, they could have defeated the Eagles because they had weapons, and not just fear and despair, which I am quite sure would not work on the Eagles. Or maybe not.
Forgive me for this may be a little out of topic, but I really want to know if the Eagles are Maiar as Thorondor is. Are they? Because if they are, I take back my opinion above.
-The White Lady of Lindon-
the real findorfin
01-24-2004, 03:09 AM
Has anyone ever suggested that the Eagles are Manwe's subjects, and as such cannot undertake the problems of Middle Earth directly. Like the Istari, they can help out when necessary, but they are not allowed to do all the work.
This would explain why they do the things they do, and equally explain the things they do not do.
The Perky Ent
01-24-2004, 11:13 AM
I've been thinking about that theroy about flying over Mt. Doom and just dropping the ring ever since I saw ROTK. Perhaps a army of Fell Beast would take them down. It was probably the risk of dropping it that would have disencouraged this idea. Eagles are very noble, and probably don't want to go flying over Mt. Doom.
Ashton
01-28-2004, 05:54 PM
The Eagles don't really want to be Involved in all this at all. They only show up in the books when they are needed but not much more. They show up mostly when Gandalf is in need of help. I do believe that Ganalf healed The "Lord Eagle" from an arrow wound. The Lord Eagle said in The Hobbit (In a way) that they like to help, If they don't put themselves at risk by doing it. I think this is the reason that they don't take Frodo over Mt. Doom.
Gorwingel
01-31-2004, 01:54 AM
The Lord Eagle said in The Hobbit (In a way) that they like to help, if they don't put themselves at risk by doing it.
Well that would make sense...
My personal opinion is that flying Frodo over to Mt. Doom on an Eagle would just not be secretive enough. Weren't the Fell Beasts basically equals of the Eagles because they were created by Morgoth to be a mockery of the Eagles? If there was a fleet of Eagles heading right straight towards Mordor, I think the Nazgul would have noticed it pretty quickly. But then this takes me to another question... Who was more powerful? Were the Fell Beasts more powerful because they had the Nazgul on their backs? Were the Eagles more powerful because they were good, and could think more for themselves than the Fell Beasts? Could the Fell Beasts have easily taken the Eagles down?
Maybe the Eagles were just afraid?
Angry Brandybuck
01-31-2004, 06:12 AM
I hate to be a 'party pooper' but any reason anyone comes up with for the Eagles' lack of involvment is no more than an excuse. Tolkien included them as a Deus Ex Machina. It was the only way certain things could get done in the book.
On the other hand, I think an Eagle could probably take on a Fell Beast, the ability to 'go into stoop' or whatever its called would give it an average attack speed of 100km/h or soemthing. This is an ability the serpentine Fell Beasts would not have.
However, this couldn't have happened if they were carrying someone/something. Birds are very well balanced creatures and adding more weight would make it harder for them to fly, maybe?
As for flying over Mt Doom and just dropping It in. Have you seen the amount of smoke and fire that comes out the top of an active volcano when erupting? No eagle could fly over the top of that low enough to be able to drop a ring accuratley into the crater. The thermals alone would stop the Eagle flying too low over the Mountain.
Kransha
01-31-2004, 07:19 AM
Eagles, similar to Gandalf, are not people (or in this case birds) who intervene all the time. They are not legal citizens who would ally with man.
First, the only reasons the eagles came to Morannon in the first place was because Gwaihir, chief eagle, owed Gandalf a favor. They were not planning to help win the war and tried to stay as neutral as possible, even though they did hope the side of light would be victorious. The eagles wouldn't have been willing to play such a crucial role, since this was a war of man, not a war of Middle-Earth vs. Mordor. They had rights as sentient citizens of Arda and would not just take Frodo all the way.
Secondly, as someone else said, that wouldn't help all that much. Even though the journey would be easier, the job wouldn't be. If the eagles carried Frodo, man would not unite under Elessar. What about the great uruk-hai hosts? What about the evil men of the south and west? What about Sauron. If Frodo got to Mount Doom without affecting the rest of the world in any way, who cares if he gets the ring in or not? Sauron might be destroyed, but his armies would destroy everything with nothing to stand in their way. Plus, no last stand of men outside the Black Gate to distract Sauron while Frodo made his final decision. But, most importantly, NO SAM AND GOLLUM! If Frodo could just fly, no one would need to come with him except other eagles (even good warriors can't fight very well on birds' backs). Sam was Frodo's voice of reason, without which he would succumb before he reached Mordor, and Gollum was the device to destroy the ring, since his giddy dancing ended up doing the job just fine.
dragoneyes
01-31-2004, 07:24 AM
To continue on from what Angry Brandybuck just said, dropping Frodo off near Mt. Doom would require the eagle to land and, not being the smallest of creatures, they would probably have a hoarde of orcs waiting below them, shooting arrows etc.
On the fell beast/eagle subject, then if the nazgul had some long range weapons then I doubt the eagles would have too much of a chance, a couple of firey arrows could probably bring an eagle down, it might not be killed, but a bird can't fly without its feathers.
The eagles were just completely against the whole secrecy tactic, not to meantion you'd have to do a whole lot more than just heal an arrow wound to persuade them to agree.
mark12_30
01-31-2004, 08:08 AM
Although I think The Real Findorfin hit on the most important point here (the Eagles are servants of Manwe first and foremost) I also consider control of the airspace the tactical/ strategic key here. The old (WWII) saw is, if you control the airspace you control the war. From Barad-Dur, Sauron had a clear view of his whole domain's airspace; and he had nine Nazgul who flew according to his whim. To send an eagle (or thirty) into that airspace would have been handing the Ring to Sauron on a feathery platter.
camomile
01-31-2004, 08:47 AM
Tolkien had a tendancy to use the egals as a Deus-Ex Machena(sp) (machine of the gods)this makes sence concidering the fact they they where servents of the Manwe. they came to the rescue in the most deperite houre in every story they are a part of. (twice in the hobbit, once to rescue thorin and Co. from the goblins, and again when the battle of five armies reached its most desperate houre. and once in LOTR when the armies of the free people of middle earth faced imosibible odd at the gate of Mordor) it seams to me that the eagles role was that of a guardinan of MI to be called on only when things where most bleaqe. I think they where the most direct intervention of the gods thet was permitted. and used only after all of the efforts of the people of MI had faild.
just my thoughts on the issue.
chears.
TheSquireof Aragorn
01-31-2004, 07:20 PM
It was mentioned before that the Eagles would likely be killed by the Nazgul if they were to fly into Mordor, but the Eagles could have perhaps dropped them off some where even if they only took them to Lorien.
I believe that the Eagles didn't fly the Fellowship anywhere because if they had LOTR wouldn't be LOTR.
vBulletin® v3.8.9 Beta 4, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.