A person?

#1
A person?
No.

A place, maybe?

A person?
No.
Place?
No.

Object?

A person?
No.
Place?
No.
Object? Yes, it's a thing.

Weapon?

A person?
No.
Place?
No.
Object? Yes, it's a thing.
Weapon? I would say no.

Jewel?

Plant?

A person? No.
Place? No.
Object? Yes, it's a thing.
Weapon? I would say no.

Jewel? No.
Plant? No.

Magical?

A person? No.
Place? No.
Object? Yes, it's a thing.
Weapon? I would say no.
Jewel? No.
Plant? No.

Magical? Good question. Yes.

Was it ever broken?

Was it made by the Elves?

A person? No.
Place? No.
Object? Yes, it's a thing.
Weapon? I would say no.
Jewel? No.
Plant? No.
Magical? Yes.

Was it ever broken? No.

Was it made by the Elves? I think you could say so.

Palantir(s)?

You think we could say so? Hmmm...
Was it made in the Second Age?

A person? No.
Place? No.
Object? Yes, it's a thing.
Weapon? I would say no.
Jewel? No.
Plant? No.
Magical? Yes.
Was it ever broken? No.
Was it made by the Elves? I think you could say so.

Palantir(s)? No.

You think we could say so? Hmmm...
Was it made in the Second Age?
The key word of centention/definition
here is "made." (It can be rather fun being a Delphic Oracle-unless
perhaps you're on the receiving end). So in answer to the question,
I do not know of it being used/made in the Second Age, so...no.

On reflection, I lean towards it being considered "made."
:)

I know!:D But don't you worry, it's plenty of fun to prod the Oracle.

Well, since you had to reflect on whether to consider it "made", are you perhaps using "make" here in about the same sense as in "make breakfast" or "make the bed"?
Or, since you can't really be expected to bother with quoting such a ridiculously long question, let me rephrase that in fewer words: Is it perhaps a non-permanent object?

A person? No.
Place? No.
Object? Yes, it's a thing.
Weapon? I would say no.
Jewel? No.
Plant? No.
Magical? Yes.
Was it ever broken? No.
Was it made by the Elves? I think you could say so.
Palantir(s)? No.
Second Age? No.

Is it perhaps a non-permanent object? Very good. Yes.

Galadriel's mirror?

A person? No.
Place? No.
Object? Yes, it's a thing.
Weapon? I would say no.
Jewel? No.
Plant? No.
Magical? Yes.
Was it ever broken? No.
Was it made by the Elves? I think you could say so.
Palantir(s)? No.
Second Age? No.
Is it perhaps a non-permanent object? Very good. Yes.

Galadriel's mirror? A great guess. But wrong.:( No.

Galadriel's phial?

Galadriel's phial?
Nyet.

Hmmm. This is tricky indeed. Let's tackle it from a different angle, then.
Could it be held in hand?

Could it be held in hand?
Nein.

In fact, you might say,
The more you grasp it the more it slips away.

This is really confusing. Is it dreams? Sorry if it doesn't make any sense, but its the best I can come up with.

Is it dreams?
No. It's material.

Hint: When was it used? Who by?

OK then: Was it used in the Third Age?

Was it used in the Third Age?
Yes.

Bruinen? I mean, the way Elrond makes it flood?

Bruinen? I mean, the way Elrond makes it flood?
No. Not related to Bruinen.

Was it used by one of the Fellowship members?

Was it used by one of the Fellowship members?
No.

And I just had another idea - the writing on the Moria Gates in ithildin?

And I just had another idea - the writing on the Moria Gates in ithildin?
Nope.

Hmm. The Third Age does span quite a few years.

What has it got in its mind? We wonders, my precioussss. Yes, we wondersss...

Was it made/used/(insert appropriate verb) within the last millennium of the Third Age (i.e. after TA 2000) ?

Was it made/used within the last millennium of the Third Age (i.e. after TA 2000) ?
Yes.