The dissolving Morgul blade
I have a small question regarding this:
Quote:
What was the cause for the disintegration of the Morgul blade? Did it disintegrate because it was being touched by Aragorn (like the movie suggests), or rather because it was exposed to the growing light?! I am not a native speaker but it seems to me that the word even suggests a strong (time-wise) correlation between the dissolving of the Morgul blade and the growing light. I think it's notable that Aragorn (contrary to PJ's film) can touch and lift the blade for seemingly some time before it vanishes. What do you think? |
Not a native speaker either, but I think this could be understood either as "just as he held it" or "while he was still holding it". In any case I think you're on the right trace associating the dissolving of the blade with the growing light.
I'd like to add another angle though. The main purpose of the Morgul knife was not to wound the body, but to corrupt the stabbed person spiritually and turn them into a wraith. As Gandalf informs us (and Frodo) in Rivendell, the knife, or at least its blade, was supposed to have stayed in the wound - maybe indefinitely, maybe only until its victim had been fully subjugated by Sauron, we don't know. It may never have been meant to be reused. Fortunately the blade missed Frodo's heart, but the splinter that broke off worked its way towards it and would eventually have accomplished its mission if left alone. So maybe it was natural for the blade to dissolve after it had fulfilled its purpose to leave a shard in Frodo's body, and it would eventually have done so anyway? |
Well, I guess there's the possibility that the Morgul blade had an build-in timer (so to speak) and the vanishing of the blade was just by coincidence in time with the growing light and/or Aragorns touch.
|
I'd like to add that perhaps any blade used by the Nazgūl to actually physically wound someone in the "light" world might be expected to vanish.
Since we see that a blade piercing a Ringwraith breaks and is destroyed, maybe contact with the truly living has a similar effect on "dark" weapons. Why this might be is uncertain, but maybe it's related to the nature of the Nazgūl, described as they are as hating light and living things, yet being attracted to them. The Nazgūl existed as extensions of Sauron's fea, and he, being a negative spirit of the dark, might impart some sort of anti-life/anti light into those who share his will and soul, which might filter down into specially made weapons intended for their use. |
Quote:
It's worth comparing to the effect on Merry's sword as well after he stabs the Lord of the Nazgūl with it: it disintegrated too. Both seem to hark back to Beowulf in which the giant-sword Beowulf uses to slay Grendel's mother dissolves in her blood, the suggestion being, I think, that evil things have a kind of matter-antimatter relationship with the world. I never thought of it before but it would explain things if the Morgul-weapon dissolved in light, which would also explain why Merry's sword disintegrated almost immediately after he had used it - the shadow from Mordor notwithstanding, it was the middle of the day. |
I didn't mean a built-in timer, Leaf, and certainly not coincidence. The fact that the blade would dissolve eventually was built in, I think, but being exposed to the light certainly sped the process up - like iron rusts faster in water than in air.
Zil, I think you're on to something bringing the dualism of wraithworld and "light" world into the picture. Maybe the way the knife was to 'wraithify' its victim was by fading back into the wraithworld after it had pierced them and taking the victim with it? |
Interessing thoughts, Inziladun and Zigūr. The vanishing of the Morgul blade fits well into that theme. Like orcs, trolls and the ringwraiths themselves (to a certain extend) it can't stand the light of the sun. Whilst thinking about this duality a certain passage of text came to my mind:
Quote:
It seems to me that the Morgul blade did indeed 'wraithify' (nice neologism, Pitchwife) Frodo, but on the polarised end of the spectrum (where folks like Glorfindel like to hang out). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pervinca, I think so too. A mere physical wound might not have traumatized him quite as much. |
Quote:
I don't imagine that Aragorn, being of the Line of the King was enough to make a blade dissolve, either. I'm imagining though that the crafter would want to hide his sorcery in order to make a cure more difficult? That doesn't hold either. Who knows what Tolkien envisioned. Perhaps, it was 'narrative purpose', i.e. 'let's give the reader a scare, and make them shudder'. I notice each time when I read, that part of the blade was missing. It must not be the part in Frodo? Or else, perhaps Elrond removed two parts of the blade, and a tiny sliver was left behind, which he caught in a narrow margin of time. I think the idea of '...growing light....' is the best explanation. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.