Winged Nazgul- Dragons, winged horses, something else? WHAT WERE THEY.
 

Is always imagined them as gryphons, actually, or maybe just winged horses. I've sen lots of different depictions and no matter what they are, they all seem to fit. I think its good Tolkien never described them.... What do YOU think they look like?

[ July 29, 2002: Message edited by: The Green Ringwraith ]

Here's what Tolkien himself said in RotK:
I would interpret the use of the word "eyrie" as an indication that is was an ancient sort of bird. If Tolkien thought of the winged steeds as a counterpart to the Eagles, that would be an additional indication.

That makes it seem more like a dumb dragon than a bird.

Hmmm, well Im thinking Dragon type of creature here. Though, then again, 'greater than all other birds', isn't that big for a Dragon. Although I could be wrong, Dragon's can get pretty small.
'and its vast pinions were as webs of hide between horned fingers' To me, this definitly sounds like Dragon wings, though, I could be wrong on this on too, Im not an expert on Dragons.
But, in any case, in my mind, it dosn't sound like any sort of bird.

I have seen these creatures depicted as pterydactiles (sp?) in several paintings. I'm not sure how accurate that might be but from the description given by Tolkien, I say it fits fairly well.
Their skin would be leathery, without feathers.
Webs of hide? from the pictures I've seen, they seem to have skin strectching between claws (or horned fingers)
And it certainly would be a creature of an older world.
Thoughts?

Sauron likes to corrupt everything, hes to lazy to create something originial elves=orcs, eagles=steeds o' nazgul, ents=trolls, man=uruk-hai, etc. I always saw these things with some short little legs, and pterodactyl type wings, with a long neck, that can whip around and growl, and see a wide range, of couse this is just my view....

I always imagined the steed to look like a sort of cross between a vulture and a bat, ithe the 'leathery wings', naked head etc, certainly not dragon like.

I think if it was supposed to be a dragon like creature, he would have described it that way. To me,he described it like a featherless bird and "the Dark Lord took it, and nursed it with fell meats, until it grew beyond the measure of all things that fly." He also said it had a long naked neck. That would seem to me to be like an ostrich neck because a dragons neck wouldn't be naked, it would be scaled. Dragons don't scream; they roar.

Wehn I read the description in ROTK, I also thought of pterodactles. The description fits.

John Howe actually painted one for his picture "The Dark Tower". A vulture with bat wings is a pretty good description. But they dont have a beak, instead they have these really big teeth filled jaws. There is a picture of one in the LOTR official movie guide.

This question has been asked before.

I imagine the winged Nazgûl steeds as birds. I stuck to the description Tolkien gave me, conjuring up the image of a large, v. ugly, featherless vulture with dragon-like wings in my head. But.. everyone's interpretation is different. But in my opinon, I think that the pterodactyls are a dumb idea. Since when were there dinosaurs in Middle-Earth?

True, I thought it was sorta dumb when I first thought of it [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img] However, it seems to fit the description that Tolkien gave as far as I can see, more than any other at least. Perhaps it was more a pterodactyl-like creature...?

Indeed it does:

In response to the question: Did the Witch-king ride a pterodactyl at the siege of Gondor?:

I don't think the Pterodactylus idea is so dumb. I mean, even if you didn't have dinosaurs in Middle Earth, if you stick leathery wings on some kind of scary, lizard-like creature, you pretty much come up with a Pterodactyl.

A bat-like creature, terror-wise, just doesn't cut it for me. It would just look like a giant, flying lizard-Pug.