Amarie your correct of course, according to canon. I just think, time being relative and everything hehe, that its more plausible for me in my mind that it's further back because we as a species go further back. I think that better explains the "lack of physical evidence" (toungue in cheek) on the geological side. 6000 yrs aint that long geolocially speaking, no? It's my logic i grant you that, but in my mind it makes more sense. Tragic but true
|