Quote:
Originally posted by Carannillion:
<STRONG>Yes, but that implies that you go against proven matemathical theories. You would be creating a new cosmos...</STRONG>
|
I didn't say that 1 = 10. What I was saying is that
if 1 = 10,
then you can conclude everything from this, even the greatest nonsense. That's why it is not really a good idea to assume 1 = 10.
One of the thrilling things in Tolkiens cosmos is that it is wholly consistent. It is, in my opinion, nonsense to ask what would happen if we add some obviously inconsistent assumpion, like "There are 10 different rings, each of them beeing the mighties of all rings".
Quote:
|
"Look, if you buggers don't stop it this instant, we're all going to take a little walk to the Cracks of Doom!"
|
*roflbtcdicajttwadbsihpwtrhitsbkabayb*
(=rolling on the floor laughing biting the carpet dancing in circles and jumping through the window almost dieing by smashing into HP who's then running horrified into the street beeing killed accidentally by a yellow bulldozer)
Ghâshgûl