My my my. It has gotten lively here, not to mention substantive. Which is great.
Lila: By all means, I concur with Nar, use the archetypes of fantasy. King, dragon, knight, it'll be fresh if you tell the story in a way that is both true to your vision and true to fantasy.
True to fantasy? Well, now, that is a matter of debate, which Eol and bombur have been doing quite handily. [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]
bombur: Regarding the idealisms of liberty, etc., I must disagree. It would not be the kind of fantasy that I personally would write, but I'm convinced that it could be done, and done well in such a way that is true to fantasy.
True to fantasy? Hmmmmm... what does that mean?
Urban fantasy pretty much explodes your hypothesis, actually. Naaramare is writing such a story. It has all the modern paraphernalia, hospitals even, and magic and Elves. Very convincing because it's well written and by the way quite self-referential, which is odd for fantasy. Certainly, Tolkien would never have written it, but that does not make it any less fantasy. I don't think there's a dark lord in it, but it does have its evil power-mongers. So I'd say it's true to fantasy.
True to fantasy.... Hmmmm... what does that mean? [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img]
To be continued.
|