View Single Post
Old 06-20-2002, 11:13 PM   #17
Naaramare
Wight
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort St John
Posts: 196
Naaramare has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Naaramare
Tolkien

Quote:
are you saying that in moments of ultimate emotional turmoil, such as intense fear, humans are not to be held accountable for their actions?
In some such situations, I would say absolutely, and the self-defense clauses in most nations laws agree with me. Biologically, if your life and safety is sufficiently threatened, your conscious mind switches off. Your body wants to survive, and if it has to make you stop thinking to do so, it will.

In regards to the original question, it's an extremely slippery slope. My answer is, if I could be sure the person I was showing mercy to could only hurt me as result of my letting them free/whatever, then yes, I would.

In the case of murderers and other such beings, however, my allowing them to walk free, to walk away, to continue to have access to things they could use to hurt people . . .that choice on my part is not only affecting me, but others. In essence, by allowing that person to walk free, I could be flat out dooming another person to pain and death.
__________________
"I once spent two weeks in a tree trying to talk to a bird."
--Puck, Brother Mine

si man i yulma nin equantuva? [my blog]
Naaramare is offline   Reply With Quote