Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SPM
But, if Man is “fallen”, doesn’t this in itself imply the existence of evil as a separate power in its own right, since the “fall” of Man could only have been brought about by the intervention of evil (as an element of the external conflict between good and evil)?
|
Well, define 'evil'!
Tolkien states (via Elrond) that
nothing was evil in the beginning
* . My understanding is that the conflict in Middle Earth is not one of 'Good' vs 'Evil' - ie two equal but opposite forces in conflict, but rather of 'Good vs corrupted/marred 'Good'. Which is why I would disagree that:
Quote:
|
the inevitability of (as explained by Gandalf in the passage quoted above) is brought about by the interference of an external evil power.
|
& say that 'Man’s ultimate submission to the Ring' is a choice made by the individual - often under
extreme pressure - & not something which happens to them as a result of their will being overwhelmed by an unstoppable force.
This means there is no need to bring in an objectively existing 'Evil' force or power in opposition to Eru (of course there are individuals who do 'evil' things, bwhat they serve is twisted 'Good').
(
* - of course, one could get into a deep discussion as to whether the 'nothing' which Elrond refers to here is the Void, in which Melkor went into in search of the Secret Fire, in which case we would have a kind of Manichaeanism - Eru=Good & the Void=Evil. But I don't think Tolkien intended that, & also, it would deny Evil any form of 'existence', & 'Evil' would then simply be an absence of 'Good'.)