[Mithalwen]

I was making a wider comment on what I have observed at that point. Only the first two sentences were intended in response to your post BB. I shall edit in a paragraph break to make that clearer. Indeed, there is much more I would know about that realtionship but wether we ever will, I don't know. However, I was trying to point out that I believe the scholar in CT would not permit, say the destruction of documents in order to protect reputation - in fact from HoME it seems that every last "back of an envelope" has been preserved. It is a difficult balance this closeness v. objectivity thing - may be not a question of wrong and right just a difference of perspective.