Quote:
Originally Posted by Fea
No, it's just mean because the only things I lie about are suspicions because it's nice to see who defends who and what the reactions are.
|
I agree that this is a valid strategy at the start of the game, since you can tell a lot by people's reactions to being accused (or defended). My own view is that, since this is (as I see it) a team game, Villagers should be more concerned about flushing out the Werewolves than avoiding being killed, unless they are the Seer or the Guardian, in which case their lives are more valuable. After all, a Villager is going to get killed each night, and you might as well risk being that Villager (or even risk getting lynched) in order to follow a course which you think will assist the Villagers in their ultimate goal of eliminating the Werewolves. Accordingly, my suspicions are always aroused when someone seems to be putting more energy into defending themselves or avoiding saying anything controversial than into trying to deduce who the Werewolves are.
But I do agree with
Mithalwen. Your strategy is one which makes you vulnerable. And I think that it's value becomes less as the game wears on when clarity rather than confusion is of most vlaue to the Villagers.
Nice analysis,
phantom. I wondered how your suspicions that
BW was the Hunter had arisen. I like the thought processes that went into selecting
Enca as your victim on the final NIGHT although, from what I knew, I was pretty sure that you would pick her,