I'm sorry if my explinations are even more bemuddled than usual. I am feeling rather ill today and it's difficult to think clearly. Basically what I was trying to say is this:
Person Y is innocent
Person X is innocent
In an attempt to protect the seer Y states that X is a wolf. Let's assume Person X wasn't lynched that day, the werewolves could use this to their advantage and kill Person Y which would cast suspicion on Person X.
Also if Person Y were to say that X is a wolf and he was lynched, of course the village would find him to be innocent than we are likely to want to lynch Person Y although he is innocent too.
Firefoot brought up a great point too. I think this has to many holes in it to provide effective cover. I think what Kuruharan said has some merit to it.
Quote:
Kuruharan-- Hmm...much strategizing is afoot here. However, something eventually has to give...
It seems to me that as far as Fordim is concerned he is either offering his idea honestly thinking it will benefit the villagers or he is a werewolf trying to pull the pelt over our eyes.
If he's honest then we should perhaps look at people opposing him. If he's not we should look at people supporting him.
Of course, how do you tell which is which...that is the question.
Barkeep! Bring me another plate of ribs...that's cattle ribs mind you.
On second thought I think I'll have a nice salad...and keep the drinks coming.
|
First dwarves having salad? What an odd thing
.
Secondly and more important I would like to know you're true feelings regarding this matter Kuru not just this safe guarded statement. You sound more like a elf than a dwarf never saying yea or nay
