Quote:
My response to that is that I'm apparently not the only one who can miss giant 'This is a Joke' signs
|
My response to that is that I know from personal experience in this type of game is that people often give away much more than they intend to with what they say.
There is a very simple way for you to solve your problem (and allay my suspicions of you at the same time). Just vote for Saucepan.
Quote:
I'm not known for my convincing arguement and having a large following such as you, tp , spm and other
|
I have a following?!

It's news to me. Look, like I said earlier, I don't know that the phantom isn't a werewolf. But we should only try to hang one at a time.
As I have been repeatedly asking, is there anyone here who does not have serious suspicions of Saucepan? The best way for you to build credibility is for you to vote for a wolf. Suddenly, when that happens, you've got some "capital" that politicians and political scientists are always nattering on about. You've said it yourself, I've built a convincing case. Don't you think it might be a good idea to get some capital to spend the next DAY. I promise you that I will read what you have to say about the phantom very carefully. You can even do what I did and take three hours and more if you like.

I'll wait to see what you have to say before I do anything. In fact, I'll even let you have first crack at it before I attempt to develop any new theories.
(This is assuming of course I live through the NIGHT.)