Quote:
|
perhaps it would be better spent on looking in the mirror and deciding how to amend your gamesmanship so that you do not appear guilty in the future....
|
Well, if I were to assume that I was at fault, my corrective action would have to be this- in the future, if someone accuses me of being guilty for a non-reason, I should not object.
Hmm... that sounds like a very silly plan, Fordim.
It is an indisputable fact that the main reasons people stated for lynching me on day three, while I'm sure they sounded good upon first hearing, do not logically hold any water when examined carefully.
It is ludicrous to expect someone to sit back and accept such a thing.
If, in the next game, several people say they think you are a wolf because your name starts with an "F", would you honestly not tell everyone "That is a very silly reason!"?
Of course you would tell them that, and I would be right there beside you telling them to leave you alone.
When false evidence is used to sentence someone to death, the rational reaction is to jump up and point it out.
When it appears that your objections were not understood, it is the rational reaction to restate it again forcefully.
When the second attempt is seemingly ignored, it is the rational reaction to become completely frustrated and desperate.
Why should I amend my completely rational behavior?