The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum - View Single Post - Tol-in-Gaurhoth IV (The Saga, erm, Still Continues...)

Firefoot · 06-29-2005, 08:19 AM

Those Ang believed innocent without a doubt now have *'s around their names.

Day 4

Hookbill - 5 (Anguirel, *Saurreg*, lmp, *Celuien*, Lalaith)
lmp - 1 (Fea)

Did not vote: Evisse, Firefoot

Voting of:
Day 3
Day 2
Day 1

I am in agreement that Evisse is probably our third wolf. As a rule, when she votes, she has voted late when the outcome of the voting was pretty much decided. Because of this, it would make sense for her to vote for Hookbill on Day 3, but abstain on Day 4 (indeed, giving every possible reason not to vote for him).

Saurreg, we don't know if we still have the Cursed villager or not. If the cursed villager was lynched, we wouldn't know it. All we would know is that we lynched a villager - therefore it could have been Oddwen, Nilpaurion, or Eomer. We don't know. (It says so in TGWBS's first post.)

06-29-2005, 08:19 AM	#11
Firefoot Illusionary Holbytla Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 7,547	Once more... the voting. Those Ang believed innocent without a doubt now have 's around their names. Day 4 Hookbill* - 5 (Anguirel, Saurreg, lmp, Celuien, Lalaith) lmp - 1 (Fea) Did not vote: Evisse, Firefoot Voting of: Day 3 Day 2 Day 1 I am in agreement that Evisse is probably our third wolf. As a rule, when she votes, she has voted late when the outcome of the voting was pretty much decided. Because of this, it would make sense for her to vote for Hookbill on Day 3, but abstain on Day 4 (indeed, giving every possible reason not to vote for him). Saurreg, we don't know if we still have the Cursed villager or not. If the cursed villager was lynched, we wouldn't know it. All we would know is that we lynched a villager - therefore it could have been Oddwen, Nilpaurion, or Eomer. We don't know. (It says so in TGWBS's first post.)