Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lalaith
We are now thanks to Anguirel, fortunate enough to have three proven innocents: Saurreg, Celuien and myself...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Anguirel
Lalaith I could still be wrong about, which would be irritating. But I'm genuinely taken in by her mathematical hopelessness and apparent honesty, not to mention the entente cordiale we seem to have formed.
|
I conjecture that my post #371, though posted almost 45 minutes before
Lalaith's post # 372, escaped her notice and that there may have been cross-posting. How else could she blithely have claimed innocence based on the faulty reasoning previous to my post?
Allow me to be clear and concise:
Anguirel did not declare
Lalaith innocent. Rather, he had a hunch that he really wanted to believe, and would have been very irritated were he wrong. So
if Lalaith is the final werewolf, and we foolishly assume her innocence based on the faulty reading mentioned above, we lose.
I find it more than a little worrying that
Lalaith has been so quick to follow up the misunderstanding of
Anguirel's words by claiming innocence that has in fact not been proven. Does this make
Lal the final werewolf? No, but it sure does make her suspicious, especially if we add in her typical failure to account for cross posting, mathematics, and other such mis-steps. She is suddenly looking a lot more suspicious to me than
Evisse, and even a little more suspicious to me than
Feanor.
So I'm asking all of you to reconsider your current spear-heading against
Evisse and take a closer look at
Lalaith. I'm not trying to protect
Evisse, either. I'm going with the evidence instead, same as yesterday.
Oh, and
Lalaith, this would be a good time to offer what defense you can ... if you can. ::LMP looks her way with narrowed eyes::