Quote:
I'm thinking that Wilwarin is actually guilty, unless somebody *coughshirrifcough* can vouch for her innocence.
|
The problem with this is that they can't vouch for eachother's innocence beyond a certain point. We all know they can't actually reveal themselves, but I don't think they're allowed to say so much that they basically reveal themselves either.
Quote:
Decided in each other's innocence, eh?
|
'Twould be a bungling pair of wolves indeed to do that, & a far too daring pair that would try to bluff by doing that.
You know, I just thought of something. There is an extremely off chance that
Oromin is a sherrif. I know that sounds wierd, but think about it. There's a good chance that the wolves know who the sherrifs are. If that is the case then they wouldn't kill them at night & they wouldn't allow attention to be centered on them during the day - once one sherrif is dead the other could really hurt them. This could get very irritating for a pair of sherrifs that are just itching to reveal themselves; so if I was the other sherrif & I knew that
Oromin would most likely have to back out later anyway...I would encourage her to get herself lynched so that I could reveal myself.
Admittedly, that is a stretch, but if it is true than we should either lynch
Oro now, knowing that it would actually help us; or keep her around as long as possible, knowing that she's innocent. But like I said, that's a pretty big stretch.
I still think
Lhuna is more likely to be the wolf &
Oro an ignorable cobbler; but I can see it won't make much of a difference who I vote for. Should I then vote bandwagon on
Oro, knowing that she is most likely a cobbler or a wolf (with the off chance of her being a sherrif, I suppose), but finding it more likely that she's a cobbler who could be ignored instead of lynched? I have no idea right now...though I suppose if she is a wolf I will be suspected for 'defending' her with that bit.
I'd better smoke a bit to clear my head & blacken my lungs.