Some excellent replies here - I'm glad there's a renewed interest in this topic!
I think the latest posts show that the title is not setting up an absolute, general rule:
Quote:
|
Not all those who wander are lost. (my emphasis)
|
There are lost wanderers, as
Anguirel and
Aiwendil's posts show - interestingly, these examples are taken from the Sil, which is quite different from LotR in many ways. The element of loss is certainly more pervasive there.
There's no need to apologize for your post,
Perky - you bring up a thought that could lead to an interesting debate. Are all who do
not wander static? Is Bombadil right to stay within the small realm he has chosen for himself? Is his wandering within those narrow boundaries enough to keep him flexible? Should we list him with Radagast as one who does a little, but too little, for the good cause in Middle-earth? Could he have helped more effectively if he had ventured out of the Old Forest, away from Goldberry - or was he doing the right thing for a married man, and only those who choose to have no family are free to wander?
davem brings up the concept of exile in connection with wandering; should that be counted with the enforced journeying, as even one who voluntarily goes into exile has a reason beyond his own control?
Hmmmm, I'm finding more questions than answers... But then, maybe questions are the wandering of the mind!