Quote:
|
it is not nearly as clear cut as you make out. It is unfortunate and I wish it were otherwise, but I think it would be best for everyone if we could just agree that it is a cloudy point. Accepting Zali as a proven innocent is a dangerous mistake
|
If you say so.
Perky made lots of seerish statements, and when he mentioned
Azalia he said he had an "INNER FEELING" about her innocence.
I am willing to take the leap of faith that
Azalia is innocent. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong, but if I'm right then the village will benefit.
You see- if most people believe that she is proven, the wolves will want to kill her, BUT, the Ranger can protect her.
Now, the wolves will know that the Ranger can only protect someone every other night, but they won't know if the Ranger will choose to protect
Azalia on the odd nights or even nights, which means they probably won't have the guts to try and kill her because they'll be afraid of wasting their nightly kill.
If you ask me, the possibility of the wolves missing out on a kill is worth a small leap of faith (and I do mean
small). And if the wolves don't kill her, then we'll have a (likely) proven innocent hanging around until late in the game which will be helpful. Once again, that is worth a small leap of faith.
The seer brought up
Glirdan for no reason and said he was hostile.
But, to my knowledge, the seer said nothing negative about
Azalia. The only thing he said was that she was innocent because of an "inner feeling".
Please, reconsider this. Isn't that pretty compelling?
But I guess if you want to be skeptical of the only seer dream we have, then go right on ahead.
Vote for
Azalia. Find out if I'm protecting a wolf.
I have very little doubt that after all of this is over
Perky will tell us that his dream was of
Azalia.