well, that wasn't too difficult. i will stick with the theory i have had all along:
kuru, and boromir. i haven't drawn a bead on the other, although im tempted to say Lalaith (but i didn't, so don't say i did).
as leaders of the group, i have a sneaking suspicion as to why we have been persuaded to lynch only innocents so far.
Quote:
Kuru, Boromir, and phantom all voted for the one who was lynched. It would have been very risky for all three of them to be the wolves. I strongly suspect at least one of them is innocoent and at least one is guilty.
Márcolië Lamen, in 344
|
i think that is exactly what is happening. boromir has been all about his "jumping out the gate" jazz. i have been suspecting kuru throughout. if a wolf trio were to pull desperate bluffs throughout the game, who would you suspect of being guilty. i think these two fit the bill perfectly. (although now that i think of it, spawn would fit more in the "desperate bluffers" catagory
one last point: we have five suspects:
Boromir88
Dancing Spawn of Ungoliant
Kuruharan
Lalaith
the phantom
three of teh five are wolves. that means at least one of my trio is in fact a wolf.
one
last thing: please, do not kill me. i don't really care if you had before, because innocents have to die to establish some points of reference. but you will all die if you do. don't say i didn't warn you. -please-
actually not
this is the last: please enumerate your evidence against me. i don't hold with lynching people on "unhelpfulness". and i don't hold with cheating. and i was gone all day yesterday and had no time to vote. (i used this to defend two innocents, gil and zali.
i would be the base master of treachury if i came out and lied about real life stuff. so my no vote yesterday cannot be held against me. that is all. don't kill me, and you won't kill yourselves....