So just what does "He would never have attacked SpM were he an innocent" mean, exactly, if not that innocents would not attack SpM?
Maybe you didn't directly link the word ridiculous to the following sentence, but the implication covered both following and preceding sentences. Even if you didn't say I was ridiculous you did clearly imply that I was wrong.
Poor use of the English language, you say? Nay Cailín, you sly bundle of sweetness and deceit, you are clearly too clever to make such a mistake.
At this stage I would also point out that Cailín's accusations of me are generally of the "You just are!" variety. I'll cite sources momentarily.
And I'll also deal with Saucepan Man's riposte momentarily.
Edit to Add: I'll actually deal with SpM later. Work calls me.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond
Last edited by Eomer of the Rohirrim; 10-04-2005 at 04:39 AM.
|