Quote:
|
I think villagers have to do the same if they want to win. I don't think individualism is what gets villagers to win.
|
But the villagers aren't
on a team because they don't know who their fellow innocents are. They cannot trust anyone (or at least, they shouldn't) until much later in the game. Even then nothing is certain until the game is over.
Quote:
|
I would disagree here. Eomer was the first to die in the last game, but I think he deserved credit for being the hunter and bringing down Cailin the wolf with him. He died early, yet he contributed and helped the villagers greatly.
|
That he did. However, things could still have gone all wrong for the village. He was not there at the end.
Quote:
|
I'm reminded of WWIIX, with the agreed mass lynching of all the innocent villagers (except the two known innocents myself and Sauce), wo we could finally catch the Bear Gurthang. Surely, without all the villagers cooperation in the mass-lynching, who knows what would have happened.
|
I've never been particularly comfortable with the idea of lynching more than two at a time. Double lynchings are find and good...triple lynchings are questionable...anything more than that is all wrong as far as I am concerned.
Anyway, I don't find that to be particularly relevant.