[Alcarillo]

Valier, you are mistaken that Garin said he thought I was innocent. He simply stated he would not cast a retribution vote against me.

Originally Posted by Garin, in post 109

As for the seer/apprentice situation I am beginning to be swayed towards the idea the more I think about it. So is that suspicious?
I doubt I will cast a retribution vote against Alcarillo. I hold no ill regard towards Cailin although some have already cast suspicion upon he/she in previous posts. I will save my vote for later. Again sticking my neck out. Because early votes can be dismissed as random while later votes can be seen as agenda driven.

Originally Posted by Menel

My suggestion is this: Lynch Nilpaurion Felagund toDay, while having the Seer ask Garin whether Lhuna's a wolf during the Night.

Originally Posted by Farael

Although if the seer knows a wolf, he/she should talk immediately as we can lynch the wolf today, have the apprentice ask him tonight about someone else and we would know a couple of innocents assuming:
-The Seer asked about two persons to Moderacil
-The Seer asked about someone else to Garin
-The Seer is obviously not a wolf
That would take four people out of the question, and as I only support the seer coming forward if he knows for sure about a wolf, that'd mean we get rid of another wolf and get four confirmed innocents. I think it's a fair bargain, don't you? furthermore, the Ranger can still protect the seer one more night (assuming he protected him last night and not someone else)

So, if the Seer knows a werewolf, he or she should proclaim his Seership, name the werewolf, and we lynch it. Then the Seer, under the protection of the Ranger, asks Garin about Lhuna. If the Seer names no werewolf (or the werewolf is Nilp), then we lynch Nilp. Sounds like a sound plan to me.