Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aman
I was completely convinced that our wolves are brilliant or at least very good in hiding, but now I see that they're not really very bright at all.
|
Ooh, she's scathing! I shouldn't think insulting them would be the best thing, they'll come after you just because of injured pride! But indeed, that is at best rather careless of the wolves - but personally I wouldn't regard it as suspicious, I do view it as probably just being a slipup. Now, maybe that's just me being biased because, as Lhuna said, the survival of
Naria who voted for me yesterday does somewhat seem to incriminate me - but please, survey the following the following voting logic from post #392:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Naria
I am on the fence with both of them but more inclined to go with Aman, since I'm not convinced that she believes in my innocence(from yesterday's vote & post and today's posts)and would gladly watch me hang.
|
This certainly gives the impression that, basically, I get
Naria's vote because she sees me as a threat to her personally
from the village: I consider her suspicious therefore she tried to take me out in order to protect herself. Now, while this definitely does absolutely
nothing to assuage my own personal suspicions of Naria (alright, there were fading, but right now? Shootin' up again
), it should at least act as some defence of me: Naria didn't so much vote for me because she thought I was a wolf, more because I was a threat to her. This may be wrong, she didn't make a very long post yesterday so I'm working with what I've got, but hey, that's my take on it. Maybe
Malkatoj would be a more worthy object of our suspicion based on Naria's post: where Naria voted for me seemingly purely to protect herself from my suspicions (I had voiced suspicions about her and therefore, as a fellow villager, I posed a 'threat'), she also voiced suspicions about
Malka, but did not, I deem, make the reasons quite clear enough.
Maybe she was simply going on other people's suspicons on this shady character, but other people have already voiced concern about Malka - but none of us can really find enough evidence against her. Or really any substantial evidence at all. Often the most we can amount it to is a 'bad feeling', and I'm not sure that really can stand up strongly enough when it's a life or death situation. Certainly, Malka bears post analysis, although I don't have time to do it now. Similarly
Azaelia definitely bears analysis: where Malka has got the rather rough end of the stick based on her silence and is being considered guilty until proven innocent, general consensus on Azaelia seems to be that she is innocent until proven guilty, again based on her silence. Is she a wolf staying low, or merely with limited computer access? Hmm.
No more time right now, sorry - I must fly, for The Miller's Tale calls...