Tsk! In this game dwarves comprised the "at risk" (to use the technical term) population. You (among others) have exploited this to the uttermost.
Exploitation of at risk population=discrimination.
I'm afraid the conclusion is rather inescapable, no matter how you try to spin it. You may as well stop trying, you're not fooling anyone.
(And before you attempt to bring it up, majority populations have been "at risk" many times in the past so you don't have a leg to stand on in pleading "but there were so many of them.")
As far as ratings go, the ratings will be just fine so long as Belladonna Took is in the final. I believe she is the one I have been promoting for some time. This suggests (I realize you and a few others may have missed it) that I have not been shooting for an all dwarf final, as I have been repeatedly accused. I personally don't have any intention of voting against any dwarves, but I don't have to. I have unwitting pawns to do all that dirty work for me while I have fun stirring the pot. They have been most cooperative, as you can tell. Belladonna is still here and another dwarf is gone. As Darth Sidious would say, "Everything is going as I have foreseen."
Of course, I said this already. However, why pay attention to what I say when you can pretend that I have said what you wanted to see and then proceed from there.
Isn't it about time for an expulsion?
__________________
...finding a path that cannot be found, walking a road that cannot be seen, climbing a ladder that was never placed, or reading a paragraph that has no...
|