Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nogrod
Roa: aren’t you kind of contradicting yourself in words and deeds? First you say (in concerto with Firefoot), that we should see to Folwren’s texts, whether they would reveal a reason for her death. Then you say, that if you were a wulf and had been suspected by Folwren, it would have been like saying "Look at me! I'm a wolf!"! So what do you think you could find from there?
|
A good point Nogrod. (Finally someone responds. Refreshing the page very 15 minutes to see if someone replied gets very tiresome.) I do think we need to look at Folwren's posts, because Folwren was killed for a reason. Unless the wolves are killing at random, in which case I should say they were rather lucky in that kill. But I don't think we should look directly at the people she was directly suspicious of, but rather the people she wasn't. Sorry for not clarifying that earlier.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nogrod
But surely, those first day impressions were positive towards Firefoot (maybe due to earlier games, knowing she is a skillful player with whom it is nice to play and sad to see dying the very first days with no good reasons), and kind neutral or even releasing towards Roa. And she had some first-day suspicions against a couple of others.
|
Fair enough. I understand why that could look suspicious, but I'm afraid I'm not functioning quite well tonight. I don't expect to use that as an excuse, just an explanation. What I really wanted to was to get people talking. If you think it makes more sense to look at the least suspicious in Folwren's eyes, by all means, look at us. It may help us out even more.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nogrod
And to amuse us all, a quote from Roa's last message:
Quote:
|
I've never been a wolf before
|
|
*Raises hands in surrender* Alright, I admit! I'm a wolf! Lynch me now!
EDIT: Cross posted with Valier and Nogrod