Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nogrod, the underlined sentence is a quote from Naria
having someone like him around would not help at all... So it's not helpful to have someone around, who really tries to make the difference (I do admit, that my first day performance was not so good: I couldn't make you all to see my point, and I didn't bet on the right horse - it was just so unbelievable that the mod would bring some RL things into a game...). I would like to ask Naria, which kind of people she would see useful around? Maybe a village full of WQ's (no posts) could be nice, or Gil-Galads (one, nonsense)? To whom, might these be of assistance: to the WW's or to the villagers? If you are a villager proper and not a traitor, why do you think that people who try to elaborate over things, who try to find clues etc. are "not of any help at all"? I would find even a elaborate wolf "of even some help" (compared to this "no help at all")!!!
|
Nogrod, you don't have to be aggressive to be able to converse! Bringing up new things and thoughts is always good, but it doesn't have to be done in an aggressive manner.
It's good for wolves to have quiet people around; not to have anyone who "presses them against the wall" (if you get my meaning), so I think we should take a closer look on those who voted loud people. Those are:
Eonwe - LMP
and
Valesse, Valier & Naria - Nogrod.
Of course they all explained why they voted for the one they voted, but you can always make reasons afterwards and cover the real reasons. Was
Eonwe's as random as he let us believe? Why did he change tactics today totally abandoning his previous tactics (in his post #142)?
Some people have accused me today because of my vote. I honestly ask you: if I were a wolf, why would I want to be more connected to THE Ka than I already was (=she voted me)? Wouldn't I want not to be connected to her in any way? I personally think that the wolves would try to avoid being connected with their fellow WWs. Maybe later on, when there's less people left, they would take contact on each other, but on first day, it would be totally unnecessary and unnecessarily dangerous for them. So in my logic it isn't sure that some wolf voted for THE Ka, though I don't say it's unprobable. Maybe the wolves just don't use same logic as I do. Besides, if I were a wolf, why would THE Ka have voted for me? I think it's too risky for a wolf to cast the first vote on fellow WW on the first day. She said she had flipped a coin, but surely she could have said it showed WQ if I happened to be her fellow WW?
I think the wolves are rather the non-bandwagoners than the bandwagoners; everyone who has played WW before knows that the bandwagoners get most analysis the next day.
Totally on a different matter - When I read
Roa's analysis of myself, I realised I was quite nonsense-speaker; I said something and then said something totally on the contrary. It's just the thing that I'm not very good at deciding, and I rather write all the pros and cons I can make up on one matter rather than only writing a plain yes or no not caring to think about the another side of the matter.