Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ang
If I were a gambler not a herald, I'd bet on one wolf in either THE Ka's lot or Nogrod's lot, and one going it alone, rather like me.
|
I agree. Though I think Lommy is in teh clear. She's right, there is too much connecting with THE Ka for it to be worthwile for a wolf. Though, of course, that could just be the way she wants us to belive. NOTE: I thought of this last night, and am not just reiterating what Lommy said herself, that would not be good evidence, now would it?
Lommy, you ask:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
Of course they all explained why they voted for the one they voted, but you can always make reasons afterwards and cover the real reasons. Was Eonwe's as random as he let us believe? Why did he change tactics today totally abandoning his previous tactics (in his post #142)?
|
If you read the post you will find I answered this: There is
no evidence on day one for me to make an educated guess. As the game porgresses, there is more and more evidece, hence more and more education, hence better and better votes. I'm not going to vote randomly when I suspect someone, but I
can't vote pointedly when I
cannot suspect anyone. Does that make sense?