Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JennyHallu
But if I had to choose which one (if, worst case scenario) both were wolvish, I would rather have around...Lommy's more likely to make her wolvishness obvious. Enca seems more dangerous...I'll wait just a little longer...
|
Apparently, even stupid villagers can help the village to lynch the wolves...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nogrod
Remember. Holby's set of "probably innocents" were Roa, Ang and me. She could have known for sure only two of them.
|
Three,
if she revealed her fellow seer.
And people who suspect me, I tell you this: why would two wolves (Enca and the imaginary wolf-Thinlómien) bandwagon for the same person (and their fellow wolf!) on Day1? Why would they have posted evidence against each other (like me and Enca yesterday) and then voted for each other? I don't think that wolves are so keen on killing each other.
My main suspects are
Eonwe and
Valesse. I don't have any special suspicions against them, but I think the rest less suspicious.
I disagree about lynching
Gil. I think we shouldn't lynch him, because no wolf would be so careless as he is. And if he is a wolf he really doesn't play a fair game. Probably by lynching him we would just lose one more innocent. Makes no sense to me.
I'm still pondering, whether I'm for or against the mass revelation. I'd say I'm for it, but I'm sure there's some fault that we haven't noticed in it. And
Ang, I didn't get your point against
Nogrod's "ranger remains secret"-theory.
Though I know why I'm not so keen on that theory. Many enough villagers have declared their ordoness and thus if the seer and the hunter reveal themselves, there aren't very many possibilities, who's the ranger and the wolf'll probably get him/her anyway.