I'll be off to a school-meeting and hope to be back before the end of the day. If the end is at 7.45 GMT, then I will surely make it.
But if I'm wrong about it, then I will have to do something now.
And just as to give some new ideas to the table, I'll go for
++ Mormegil
And will surely retract it, if there is some better points made while I'm away (and especially if Gil doesn't turn out before the end).
But why?
1) His overhasty, ill-willed vote for me with no grounds whatsoever (disguised as a justified reaction, which it surely was not). Speaks of the evil, not of a constructive fellow-villager.
2) Accusing others of being blood-thirsty and acting as much worse himself (not only suggesting something to be considered, but accusing and also voting, by saying, not probably retracting).
3) Playing to the hands of the wolves: lynch vocal players trying to do something by the villagers during the day, kill the smart ones during the night.
4) His arrogant playingstyle that sets double standards. See his post #30. First he requires explanations from others, then he himself explains his viewpoints this argumentative and explanatory way:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefoot
While I can see where many of you are coming from with your points about Nogrod, I'm not sure that it merits lynching him.
Oh yes it does!
|
and:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefoot
I'm not sure a wolf would be that forward.
Yes they would.
|
5) Pure nausea. I wouldn't be that frustrated, if I would be voted out by some whimsical first day reasons like "he writes the word ''wolf' with a 'u' every fifth time" etc. That would be sad, but not frustrating. Trying purposefully to lynch someone who tries to help, is just nasty (and possibly stupid too).
See you later, before the vote ends.
PS. And thanks Feanor for the analysis to come!
PS2. Boro:
Quote:
|
or is he being the clever wolf poller?...trying to see where the village stands and make his plan with his buds?
|
I think it's the task of both villagers and wolfs alike to poll the others to get a picture of the situation: even more urgent with the villagers to know, who to trust. So I can't see trying to arouse discussion as an argument to someone's wolfishness...