I'm working on catching up on all that's been said so far today, and will have something more substantial up here soon, but at the moment these couple of things caught my eye:
Quote:
|
most of us are putting a great deal of effort into our phrasing, making sure every word means exactly what we do, and cannot be misconstrued.
|
I don't. If you're really innocent and don't have anything to hide, I guess it seems to me that every word shouldn't have to be carefully chosen. *shrugs*
Quote:
|
Nogrod, now it's possible that he is a wolf and so that two wolves aren't lynched he voted for Fea. However, I severely doubt this and think now he is innocent, and I think his innocence I can show a bit later on with who I think our wolves are.
|
I don't understand this logic. Not saying anything about Nogrod's innocence or guilt, I think this is quite shaky grounds to clear him on. If he was a wolf,
of course he would change his vote to Fea. I realize that you account for this, but you don't give any other reasons that I saw for marking him as innocent. Care to explain, or point me back to someplace that I missed?
Also, I advise against trying to decipher too much out of Fea's posts about who might be innocent or guilty. Fea is insane and will have gone out of her way to confuse us all (she probably would have done that were she innocent as well). There is no way of telling how much of that she was being honest in.
Without much analysis, Boromir is starting to look suspicious to me. More when I post next...