Response to TGWBS's & Tar-A's votes
Yeah, I like defending myself. If I didn't you'd say I was hiding, so here goes.
If 0 wolves were voted for on Day One, then they start looking to villager defences to find a Seer. Anguirel defended Garin, so they kill him.
If 1 wolf voted for on Day One, they are scared of Seer dreaming about said wolf. Example: If LMP is a wolf, they kill Eomer or Gurthang because they voted for him. This could only have been the case if Glirdan was the one wolf (which was my mistake).
I have no idea where I got that 0 or greater-than-1 idea. It was a mistake. I was thinking out loud. Wolves generally don't make stupid mathematical mistakes like that. If I am a wolf I don't make mathematical posts because I'm not clever at it. Because I'm innocent I can afford to just type whatever the hell I'm thinking at that time. I think that stupid post I made actually speaks in my favour!
Anyway, the answer could be obvious: Anguirel was killed because Glirdan feared him. Or: we were totally wrong in our Day One voting.
Anyway...
Tar, I referred to Anguirel's post #21 and not his post #69. He accused both me and Kath there. I'm not denying that Anguirel's death implicated Kath, me and Glirdan. In fact, that was my whole point. I was asking why Farael defended Kath and not me when we were both mentioned in #21; and I asked why certain villagers were quick to point out that Anguirel's death made Kath look bad, while at the same time ignoring me and Glirdan.
I don't understand what is wolvish about that.
* And a quick response to Glirdan. Don't play dumb with me, laddie! You know fine well what I was asking you. I'll say it again: If you are innocent, then why did the wolves not gleefully accuse you on Day Two, considering Anguirel voted for you? Seems very odd to me.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond
|