Quote:
Originally Posted by Lal
I'm getting confused about Guy again. I started today fairly sure I was going to vote for him but now I don't know.
|
You don't want to vote for me.
Yes, you do. He's a dirty werewolf!
Quiet, Abrahadam! This isn't a good time.
It's never a good time with you.
Shhh...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caran
What I mean is that if, say, I were the one under a lot of suspicion right now, I would know myself to be innocent, but I would understand if people waited until I was dead to follow my advice (since they wouldn't know I was innocent until then).
|
Fairy Nuff. This sounds logical.
In any case, I think we need a free vote because this stuck out to me:
Hmm. I can't find the exact quote. Basically, having rigid voting schemes will result in wolves being able to use the scheme - "I had to vote to keep with the double lynching plan - to escape detection.
So a free vote today, for later analysis.
And if I am killed and proved innocent, double lynchings thereafter. Sound's fair.
Quote:
But I'd hardly call this a random sampling, since you're the one, TGWBS who picked out Naria to be lynched.
|
Naria doesn't have to be the other lynchee. I simply view her as more suspicious than others. Left to its own devices, I believe the village would pick
Glirdan as its other lynchee.
Quote:
Statistics say that if we randomly lynch two people everyday...
|
This isn't random. It is maths in conjunction with analysis. We pick the two most suspicious.
Yes. You refuting this, you bringing up former games, you doing anything cannot change this. If there is x chance of catching a wolf on any day, then double lynching results in a 2x chance of catching one.
And now I retire for the night. Farewell.