So, are there any patterns here to be seen? (The following "synopsis" is not in an accurate order of things happening, but more like trying to bind things together)
Farael has been very active, stirring discussion. Picking on a couple of people with zero-backing.
Eonwe declaring his "voting for the 7th person in the list" -tactics.
Farael attacking & voting Eonwe
Morm disliking Eonwe's tactics, noting Farael vs. Diamond issue.
Glirdan, backing Morm's suspicion about Farael vs. Diamond.
Roa seeing sense in both Eonwe & Morm, asking for explanation from Morm & Glirdan about their suspicions on Farael vs. Diamond. Accusing Farael of early voting & trying to distract us.
And all this has led to a situation, where voting stands as follows:
Eonwe 2 (Farael 1., Form 3.)
Farael 1 (Alcarillo 2.)
Nogrod 1 (Lommy 4.)
Clearly Farael and Eonwe have been the most controversial players so far (Thank's Lommy for holding my flag up too!
). The others have been very careful indeed - if we don't count Roa's quite attacking style against Farael (posts 24, 27, 28).
I don't have Farael quite so high in my suspicion-list. He may be rushing around, but not in an overtly suspicious manner - and his vote for Eonwe seemed to me stem from principles concerning playing styles (+ quite well argued point about declaring a fully random vote very early on being good tactics by a cat!). Neither do I see Eonwe as overtly suspicious, for he seems generally to play like that. And even if I don't quite agree with him about the reasonableness of his tactics, I can't say to suspect him either, at least for the time being.
So, again I'm also a bit worried about us possibly lynching outspoken villagers just because they talk. That is quite bad politics. Maybe we should also see, what those less posted ones have actually said so far...
I'll have to go back reading essays to school, but will be back in a couple of hours, and hopefully for a bit longer then.