Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sauce
I was working off spawn's list, which omitted JennyHallu's vote.
Interesting that spawn omitted it from her earlier list (although I doubt a Duck would draw attention both to herself and the person she omitted like that
|
I for one was working off
Valier's list from yesterDay.
Mith has been calmer toDay which is nice, but doesn't necessarily indicate her innocence. I've actually started thinking that she's the Goose with the talk about that we'll see that she's an innocent if we kill her etc. Also,
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mith
I don't see anything wrong with my goose logic. If we lynch someone strongly suspecting them to be a duck and they turned out to be "innocent" = and we know that term covers some distinctions, it is a stong possibility that they were the goose rather than an ordo or a gifted.
|
Haven't you ever suspected someone and then been truly surprised when they turned out to be innocent? We lynch people whom we strongly suspect to be Ducks every Day, that's the point of this all. Some of them are likely to be innocent, and since they all can't be Geese, it's possible that none of them is and therefore it isn't safe to make assumptions like that. I can't help thinking that you're the Goose who's hoping that we assume that the first innocent we lynch will be regarded as the Goose instead.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lalaith
A question for Spawn: have you been doing your analyses as the mood takes you, or focusing just on those villagers you suspect/find intriguing?
|
Both.
With considering schedule restrictions, of course...
That said, I need to vote soon. I shall go doing some rereading now.