[Nogrod]

Oh my!

Aren't we now missing something? Glirdy gave us a duck - and by the last night's narration, was an innocent himself (so not a duck, but either a fool villager or a gifted - an Owl)? So why would a villager pretend to be an Owl in that situation? Or how could he trustt the foull-play, and get the duck right by pure chance (being an goose, so not knowing the identities of others)?

Maybe Glirdan was true?

But what does this make of Mith then? I duly understand, that I am one of the involved, but a duck's revealment - giving us all those innocents which she would truly know as a duck - would really credit her. And I see, both me and Spm being quite strong about this, tending to believe her as she has granted our innocence (well not perfectly, but still). And wouldn't that be the most genious way of a duck-play? She revealed us only on day2 - and as a duck, she would have known the situation (one duck more) already, and come to think of it?

As I just came to see this, I will have to reconsider my vote (I already pointed this possibility in my first post of today, but only now started to see it more clearly). On this basis, I will strongly think of voting Mith today.

EDIT: X-posted with the 4 last ones...