Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mormegil
We cannot lynch the GW even if we tried so why would the EW desire to protect him/her?
|
Because... uh... if we try to lynch the GW, we find out for absolute certain who the GW is and then we have a definative innocent that knows several other current innocents around which to rally?
My thought was that if the GW steps forward, we have only his word on it. If we attempt to
kill the good wizard, we have evidence. Surely the EW would prefer that we be as uncertain as possible without actually trying to kill anyone. I think. But if the GW does step forward, my point is moot. Right? But what's to stop wolves or the EW from stepping forward also to confuse everyone...
I have a mind-numbing headache right now that's blocking all rational thought and until it goes away, I'm leaving my computer. I'll be back later to hopefully do this stupid evaluation thing and reread this and see if it makes sense.