View Single Post
Old 05-30-2006, 02:23 PM   #96
dancing spawn of ungoliant
Mischievous Candle
 
dancing spawn of ungoliant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: So near to Russia, so far from Japan, quite a long way from Cairo, lots of miles from Vietnam.
Posts: 1,234
dancing spawn of ungoliant has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via MSN to dancing spawn of ungoliant
Okay.

Interesting skirmish between Sauce and Lommy there. I'm not really suspicious of either of them although in my opinion Sauce has been more rash than usual. It looks like that the little debate with him and Lommy was mostly a misunderstanding, but I remember hearing about one of Sauce's ancestors who made a brilliant performance as a clueless villager. This could be a similar act, but not enough for getting a vote from me toDay. Sometimes it just pays off to vote for some "big-name" villager even on Day 1, but I wouldn't certainly do it without as good reasons as possible. If we want to find the wolves, we need to vote for the villager we find the most suspicious regardless of their status, but voting them more or less randomly doesn't help at all.

TGWBS is confusing me with all those Pidgeys and stuff. I've never been a fan of Pokemon, maybe that's my problem, but to me it looks like that he's made his presence clear only with talking about those creatures. When I read his posts they have little substance in them. I believe we have another Day 1 hater here...

His random abacus told him to vote for Cailín and he is confident about his choice. He says that Sauce is being inconsistent, but wonders if he should have used smilies. His comments about other affairs of the village (votes & roles) are "don't care" and "apathetic" with a few lines of speculation.
When morm voted for him, he wanted to know morm's reason. Would it have helped if he had said that he has an abacus, too..?

Oh, and Boro, me writing about your decision not to reveal your tactic was a part of a small summary of your doings. I haven't said my own opinion about that yet. That aside, I'm not comfortable with you somewhat twisting Lommy's words. When you quoted Lommy's post #40, you conviniently left out the last part of the phrase which would have made more sense. I don't know whether Lommy is innocent or not, but in any case quoting someone in a way that on purpose makes them look worse than they are isn't fair.

On a lighter note, "But you [Lommy] did say they [retractable votes] cause confusion and that wolves would benefit giving them "perfect cover." I don't know how it gives them cover? Sure as heck hasn't given me cover today." ~Boro

Ooh, are you confessing? (Or am I too tired... )
__________________
Fenris Wolf
dancing spawn of ungoliant is offline   Reply With Quote