OKay, sorry this took so long; I kept getting side tracked.
Dimwe Diamond
Day 1 Summary
1st post - vote for Eomer, retraction for Eomer, in-character nonsense
2nd - nonsense response to Valier's nonsense statement, doesn't understand the discussion about the cobbler, will be glad if the cobbler goes down, the now infamous "seer revealing the cobbler" plan
3rd - Finds discussion boring, wants to hear some crazy theories, doesn't see much point in early analysis, response to Boromir about vote for Eomer, explains that she didn't want to the seer to come forward just for the cobbler.
4th - points out that phantom almost always uses arrows
5th - gut feelings on people, thinks she may be way off
Valier - normal
Herself - penguin
Naria - worrisome
Mac - innocent
Lal - not sure
Firefoot - innocent
Jenny - innocent
Roa - where'd she go?
phantom - okay
Boromir - innocent
Spawn - innocent
Kitanna - not acting evil
Enca - nothing, never played with before
Ang - okay
Eonwe - shady
6th - response to Lal, restates that she has niggling feelings about Lal, Roa, Eonwe, Naria, Enca, valier
7th - long statement about her opinion on summaries and analysis, prefers to wait until there are some deaths so that there are knowns before analyzing, also prefers to just link posts rather than make people slog through what they've already read, says she won't tell others not to post summaries, thinks the bickering is making everyone involved look a bit foul, worries that the wolves may be hiding better because of it
8th - isn't confident about voting, Votes Lal, says some of statements about other players don't sit well
Day 1 analysis
Concerning her seer-cobbler idea, it didn't seem at all odd to me. When I read it, I simply thought that she meant if the seer knew who the cobbler was at the time she came forward, then we could simply ignore that person for the remainder of the game, rather than waste a lynch. What bothers me is how she addressed the concerns about it. She said that all she meant was that when the seer came forward with some penguins, if the seer also knew who the cobbler was, she could point that out, too. This is a wholly obvious statement- the very kind she was putting down when she stated she was bored by the discussion. Strange bit of hypocrisy...
I also find her statement about not likeing to analyze things before some deaths not very Diamond like at all. She knows perfectly well that this has caught a wolf on Day 1, with out seer reveals. I don't know, but it seems the usual Diamond spark is missing.
And then there was her lists- she told Lal that she had bad feelings about her, myself, Eonwe, Naria, Enca, valier. However, her previous post showed that she didn't know anything about Enca, who had yet to post. How could she be worried about someone who had yet to show? It can't be past experience, because Diamond said that she had never played with Enca before.
There was also the rather bold statement of declaring herself a penguin.
Day 2 summary
1st post - Tells Lal that if she was the one dreamed that it's okay to reveal, but advises her to keep silent unless the person was going to get lynched, advises her to be silent about the hunter, says she can now see the strategy Lal was trying to employ, remarks about Arthur Dent, says she's going to go back through Boromir's posts
2nd - response to Mac, says Mac just seemed too overt in posting to be guilty, says it's too easy for newbies to sail along quietly and not rock the boat, claiming newbieness, and Mac didn't do that, which makes him look innocent, response about cobbler, rule posting
3rd - banter with Lal
4th - Points out that she's only seen Boromir as a seer, which makes understanding his wolfish posts somewhat difficult, thinks that she may dig through the grimoire to see what she can find, decides to wait for phantom
5th - wants to know if anyone posted pms at the end of TiG X
6th - analysis of Boromir's behavior in TiG X, notes that he never put phantom or Lalaith in his most suspicicious list, says that it is quite likely that Boromir put one wolf in his Not suspicious group, and one in his somewhat suspicious group, inclined to think Ang and Roa innocent for the time being, points out the flaw that Boromir might be playing differently
7th - response to Lal about Boromir's behavior, notes that he may use the same mentality that helped him win previously, or try something new that phantom and Lal wouldn't recognizee, points out that the people Boromir's habits point to have also made suspicious votes, says she will likely vote for Valier, Jenny, Spawn, or Eonwe, gives reasons for looking at all but Valier, thinks Ang looks rather gennuine in his attack on her
8th - Valier analysis
http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpos...&postcount=185
Over all finds her slippery.
9th - Spawn analysis
http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpos...&postcount=190
Finds Spawn to be rather odd, but wants to lay off her since she'll be gone all day
10th - Eonwe Analysis
http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpos...&postcount=194
Eonwe is evil and must die. Hopes mod fire will destroy him.
11th - Explains shoemaker to Mac
12th - Jenny analysis
http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpos...&postcount=212
Either a preoccupied ordo or the cobbler
13th - Agrees with Roa about Jenny, still believes Jenny to be cobbler, says she will try to get Eonwe lynched tomorrow if he votes just to stay alive, finds Spawn the most penguinesque, but doesn't want to vote for her because of absense, remark about music choices
14th - Sympathizes with Ang, thanks roa for vote count
15th - Votes Valier
16th - Agrees with Ang that she is mildly suspicious
Day 2 analysis
She never gave a real reason for going after Valier, excep that she was on Boromir's likely innocent list.
Also, she repeated that she had never played with Boromir and so didn't know his style, and she also noted the same with Enca. The Diamond I know has never let a lack of knowledge about a player stop her from analyzing and making assumptions about them.
Again, she agrees with Ang that she's suspicious, a rather bold move akin to her first day assertion that she's a penguin. So, she's not confident enough to know who to vote for, but she is confident enough to make that kind of statement?