My thoughts:
Non-use of land to the 'best' purpose it could be given does not constitute abandonment of the land. Nor does it give a neighbor who does have what he considers a good use for the land the right to move onto the land without permission. Arrgh. Eminent domain cases. A pet peeve of mine. Anyone curious and up for hearing a rant can PM me after my exams are over this Friday. 
So my list of questions for the arguers in the case would be the same as Eodwine's. I would be strongly inclined to make the squatting party pay rent. And maybe a fine...
__________________
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect. But actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey... stuff.
|