++Anguirel
I'm fairly convinced of his guilt. Yesterday I saw a major contradiction in him and the Eomer kill makes perfect sense for him as well. I was not defending Eomer, merely I was saying that we shouldn't attack somebody because of 'tradition' especially when he hadn't arrived. Ang is an intelligent fellow and knew what I meant yet turned it around and tried to twist what I said, yet he did the exact thing he found suspicious of me doing; buddying up to Eomer. I attacked Eomer's slaves not defending Eomer. Anguirel on the other hand fairly overtly buddied up to him. He claimed my vote of Glirdan an attempt to get a bandwagon going...HA! At that point nobody had said anything and I didn't even give a good reason. I saw Ang subtlely attempting to spin off suspicion onto me. Now he's trying to use Eomer's death to shield himself by saying it makes others look suspicious but being careful not to point out his feelings yesterday on him, he's too intelligent to go that route.
Glirdan is probably guilty too.
__________________
“I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.
"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”
|