... and they're probably right. Few has been said or done (except by mainly Nogrod) yet and there is few to go on for me so far. The suspicions I have are vague at best.
proven innocent are
mormegil and, at least to me, myself.
Nogrod and
Jenny feel innocent to me as yet, but that may change rapidly.
I cannot put
Valier anywhere, thus keeping up the tradition.
The ones I need to read more of before I can form an opinion about them are
Mithalwen,
Eomer and
Kitanna.
I'm still slightly suspicious of
Roa, and his last post made
Kuru blink on my radar.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by said Kuruharan
However, from my perspective, things look pretty bad. The reason being that I have combed Signore Formendacil’s posts and found no evidence of Seerness until the last post (although he was pretty consistent in saying that morm was innocent, just not definite about it until the end). The upshot of this is I’m not sure how much we can read into the people who were going after him. That just needs to be said.
|
Well, of course Form didn't make his seerness so clear - he's not suicidal. If it had been clear, presumably no wolf would have bothered voting for him. Instead they would have silently finished him off in the night. His being a seer was not obvious and this is good for us, because the reasons given for his lynching were intentionally or unintentionally wrong. If we can sever the two, we might catch a wolf, but I have doubts that we can.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by that Dwarven Shade, again
Macalaure seems a bit defensive. Now, I’m always an admirer of a strong defense. But, really, he seems a bit tense.
|
I am not defensive. Not at all! And I
am not tense.
