I'd just like to add this comment from
Formendacil from the discussion that underwent this statement:
Quote:
|
The very fact that we feel compelled to make this statement ought to speak for our strong loyalty to the website.
|
To the point!
Very many of us are worried about the things that have happened... Let us not break this fine community with this kind of polarising and harming actions. The bannig of Davem was an extreme move and this statement is another extreme move to balance it somewhat. (and I do accept my responsibility for being one who has contributed to the statement and has signed it too - ie. I'm not declaring myself neutral here)
Now let us sit down and heal this!
PS.
Reading the post of
Aiwendil, I have to comment just a little...
How come
Davem was first banned to a short time and after he came back was never notified that his posting was "bad" until he was just outright banned for life? What's the logic here? It's very hard to find a post of
davem during the short season he was "back again" that would be the cause of the new (and definitive) banishment!
At least we should all have a right to see it! The reason must be in between the post(s) that
Davem made after his short time banishment ended and when his final banishment was executed. In which post did he do it too bad then? I think I can speak of many here, but we can't see the reason lying in there between - and if it's not there, then the banishment was not fair as it was not grounded on actual posts but on something else...