Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SPM
At the risk of further accusations of borderline autism from Mith, I have worked out that the strict retrospective application of voting rules (player identified in capital letters with name fully stated) would have resulted in the phantom being lynched on Day 1.
|
You must be counting different than I am. According to my count only
Roa's vote for
Di, your vote for
lmp, and my vote for
Di were proper. That would've seen
Di lynched.
But besides, you can't go back after the fact. If that happened you would have to go back to Day 2 and play all over again, for
Di's votes would no longer count the rest of the days, however the votes of those who had been "wrongfully lynched" (eg Boro on Day 1) would suddenly be allowed again, but since he was gone from Day 2 on he would have to go back and cast votes after the fact, and so on down the line. It would be a chain reaction that the only way to solve would be to rewind to day 2 and play over again- but of course if we did that knowing what we now know everyone would just vote for
Fea and the game would end, thus it wouldn't solve anything.
I had this logic in mind before suggesting my strict interpretation.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mith
However I find Phantom's search for loopholes whether "legal" or not, unsporting.... so I would not want him to win
|
What? Nothing is out of bounds when it comes to stopping WWs. Anything goes. Tis the Wolves who need to be sporting and somewhat honorable, for they are the ones attacking innocents without just cause.