[Anguirel]

Analysis of Bomburlass

Triggered by Bofgrod’s apparent assumption of her innocence (which at this stage, pre-analysis, I broadly agree with)

#23 – in-character banter with Orilin

#56 – reasonable and practical criticism of Farael’s plan to lynch those who don’t contribute – a plan he often puts forward in some form.

#74 – finds Gloanna’s guilt statistically unlikely. Votes spawn for being too diplomatic.

#106 – voting record; suspects Beorn. Most substance so far.

#109 – thinks spawn was “a safe kill”.

#115 – disagrees with Voloin about spawn’s supposed Twin clue

#117 – further categorises voting. Suspects the inconspicuous. Maybe a bit rich?

#151 – picks up Valier’s use of “special role”

#155 – votes for Beorn in the belief that she tried to save a fellow wolf (not clear who).

#186 – mourns Farael, tries narrowing down suspects

#187 – points out pronoun inconsistency.

#189 – dismisses Farael’s posts

#233 – votes Beorn. Wrongly describes Bofgrod and Nori’s quarrel as too heated to be feigned; they’ve just, with apparent reluctance, declared each other innocent. Reminds me of the Rapallo Pact...

In conclusion – I do believe in Bomburlass’s innocence; she is consistent, thorough, her statistics are helpful and her thinking is clear. However, I suspect she is being used by some more vocal than she, especially, and I’m sorry to get back on a hobby-horse, Bofgrod. I intend to lay out some of my worst misgivings about him and then, probably, vote for him.