Quote:
|
Lalwendė, because of the few posts you've made during my absence I feel less uneasy about you. But I didn't quite get what you were saying in #234...
|
I was speculating on what
Eomer observed, looking at the patterns of behaviour against or pro those who voted for
Gil yesterday. Doing that little analysis though, I've realised you are probably not one of the ones who may or may not be in the group acting against
Gil voters.
Farael is in this group seemingly, without going deeper into his posts, and yet he is quite vehemently against you,
Lommy. Why would he bluff to that extent? It would just make any plot far too baroque and complex.
I think you are right on those roles, especially going by Nogrod's narration as the day began. All this speculation on what they might be is smokescreening as it seems more or less clear, all apart from which side everyone is on for sure and how much people know about who has what role. And what purpose does it serve if we root out Rangers? It would only help the wolves. I think it would be safer too for the Hunter and the dagger person to remain quiet, even if whoever has this dagger is a bit scary as it's like having a lynch opportunity that's not subject to a vote so we're all vulnerable if they get it wrong.
