Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Thinlómien
Hmm... I'm messing this up. Actually, even if I'd been earlier, that wouldn't have helped.
Good point Lal, Mith might be the cobbler since she's posting her confused role-speculation all the time... maybe to get us confused? As interesting that theory is, I still think it's more probable that she's innocent innocent.
edit: xposting with the last 2 posts
|
Plus there was all the obvious umming and ahhing over the roles when Nogrod's narration was pretty clear. The only thing I've got confused on as new to this is what Rangers do in the day.
I'm disappointed actually.