All right, good point, Ang. I also noticed this, in Kath's first post:
Quote:
|
So we're supposed not to rely on past suspicions. Very well. Boro, Eomer and morm are all innocent! That probably goes for Lommy, Volo and Roa too. And Rune and Gil.
|
All dead - and all innocent (well, Rune to the extent that he wasn't a wolf - and we don't know if the wolves know who he was, either).
However, your evidence, Ang, is largely hinging on whether Lal is a wolf. If she is, then yes, killing Kath could very well be worth it. If she's not, though, I would be extremely wary of killing Kath.
How exactly does your role work - as in, when can you make kills, and when do you have to decide?